Suppr超能文献

早期宫颈癌行根治性小子宫颈切除术的安全标准:多中心临床病理研究。

Safe criteria for less radical trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter clinicopathologic study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun;19(6):1973-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2148-7. Epub 2011 Dec 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine the safe criteria for less radical trachelectomy to treat patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records and pathologic slides of 65 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA-IB1 cervical cancer. The safe criteria for less radical trachelectomy were determined by using three factors such as tumor size ≤ 1 cm, stromal invasion ≤ 5 mm, and no lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) for minimizing parametrial involvement, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and the need of adjuvant radiotherapy. The diagnostic values were investigated by calculating specificity, negative predictive value for no parametrial involvement, no LNM, and no need of adjuvant radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The median age was 32 years (range 22-44 years), and the median duration of follow-up was 26 months (range 2-103 months). Among seven single or combined factors for the safe criteria, (1) tumor size ≤ 1 cm, (2) tumor size ≤ 1 cm and stromal invasion ≤ 5 mm, (3) tumor size ≤ 1 cm and no LVSI, (4) tumor size ≤ 1 cm, stromal invasion ≤ 5 mm, and no LVSI did not show parametrial involvement, LNM, and the need of adjuvant radiotherapy. In particular, tumor size ≤ 1 cm showed the highest specificity (28.1-29.5%) and negative predictive value (100%). In spite of no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between tumor size ≤ 1 cm and >1 cm (P = 0.22), tumor size ≤ 1 cm showed better PFS without disease recurrence than tumor size >1 cm (2-year PFS, 100% vs. 90%).

CONCLUSIONS

Less radical trachelectomy may be safe in patients with early-stage cervical cancer who have tumor size ≤ 1 cm.

摘要

背景

为了确定更保守的宫颈锥切术治疗早期宫颈癌患者的安全标准。

方法

我们回顾了 65 例国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)IA-IB1 期宫颈癌患者的病历和病理切片。通过肿瘤大小≤1cm、间质浸润≤5mm 且无淋巴血管间隙浸润(LVSI)这三个因素来确定最小化宫旁侵犯、淋巴结转移(LNM)和辅助放疗需求的更保守的宫颈锥切术的安全标准。通过计算特异性、无宫旁侵犯、无 LNM 和无需辅助放疗的阴性预测值来研究诊断价值。

结果

中位年龄为 32 岁(范围 22-44 岁),中位随访时间为 26 个月(范围 2-103 个月)。在用于安全标准的七个单一或联合因素中,(1)肿瘤大小≤1cm、(2)肿瘤大小≤1cm 且间质浸润≤5mm、(3)肿瘤大小≤1cm 且无 LVSI、(4)肿瘤大小≤1cm、间质浸润≤5mm 且无 LVSI 均未出现宫旁侵犯、LNM 和辅助放疗的需求。特别是肿瘤大小≤1cm 具有最高的特异性(28.1-29.5%)和阴性预测值(100%)。尽管肿瘤大小≤1cm 与>1cm 之间在无进展生存(PFS)方面无差异(P=0.22),但肿瘤大小≤1cm 无疾病复发的 PFS 优于肿瘤大小>1cm(2 年 PFS,100% vs. 90%)。

结论

对于肿瘤大小≤1cm 的早期宫颈癌患者,更保守的宫颈锥切术可能是安全的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验