• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冲击噪声对军事人员听力的影响。

Effects of impact noise on the hearing of military personnel.

机构信息

Universidade Tuiuti, Paraná, Hospital da Policia Militar, Paraná.

出版信息

Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Nov-Dec;77(6):747-53. doi: 10.1590/S1808-86942011000600011.

DOI:10.1590/S1808-86942011000600011
PMID:22183281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9443702/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Shooting is an activity that exposes military personnel to noise impact, which may cause irreversible effects on hearing.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate impact noise on the hearing of military personnel that practice shooting.

STUDY DESIGN

A case-control retrospective study.

METHODS

115 military personnel were enrolled; 65 had been exposed to impact noise and 50 were non-exposed. Firearm noise levels were evaluated, subjects answered a questionnaire and underwent threshold tonal audiometry and otoacoustic emissions testing.

RESULTS

The average noise level was 125 dB(C). Most subjects (78%) believe that noise may cause hearing loss; nearly all (92.3%) used ear noise protectors while shooting, but most (32.3%) had never received guidance for using this equipment. There were significant differences between the two groups in relation to changes suggesting impact noise-induced hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

The differences between groups show that noise-exposed military personnel are more likely to develop hearing loss. The goal of a hearing conservation program for this population should be to preserve hearing and educate these individuals about the importance of using hearing protection correctly.

摘要

非特定

射击活动会使军人暴露于噪声影响下,这可能对听力造成不可逆转的影响。

目的

评估射击训练对军人听力的冲击噪声影响。

研究设计

病例对照回顾性研究。

方法

共纳入 115 名军人,其中 65 名曾暴露于冲击噪声下,50 名未暴露。评估枪支噪声水平,受试者回答问卷并进行阈值纯音测听和耳声发射测试。

结果

平均噪声水平为 125dB(C)。大多数受试者(78%)认为噪声可能导致听力损失;几乎所有人(92.3%)在射击时使用耳塞,但大多数人(32.3%)从未接受过使用该设备的指导。两组在提示冲击噪声引起听力损失的变化方面存在显著差异。

结论

两组之间的差异表明,暴露于噪声下的军人更有可能出现听力损失。针对该人群的听力保护计划的目标应该是保护听力,并教育这些个体正确使用听力保护的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9503/9443702/a1c91af55afc/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9503/9443702/8302ebb37ca8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9503/9443702/7d25556bb12b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9503/9443702/b64bf2f67cfc/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9503/9443702/1181dcf0041f/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9503/9443702/a1c91af55afc/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9503/9443702/8302ebb37ca8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9503/9443702/7d25556bb12b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9503/9443702/b64bf2f67cfc/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9503/9443702/1181dcf0041f/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9503/9443702/a1c91af55afc/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of impact noise on the hearing of military personnel.冲击噪声对军事人员听力的影响。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Nov-Dec;77(6):747-53. doi: 10.1590/S1808-86942011000600011.
2
[Analysis of hearing threshold shift measured by otoacoustic emissions in soldiers after shooting with use hearing protectors].[使用听力保护器的士兵射击后耳声发射测量的听阈移位分析]
Med Pr. 2006;57(2):109-14.
3
Hearing loss among military personnel in relation to occupational and leisure noise exposure and usage of personal protective equipment.军事人员职业性和休闲性噪声暴露与听力损失及个人防护设备使用的关系。
Noise Health. 2020 Oct-Dec;22(107):90-98. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_12_19.
4
Acoustic and psychoacoustic analysis of the noise produced by the police force firearms.警用枪支噪声的声学和心理声学分析。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Mar-Apr;77(2):163-70. doi: 10.1590/s1808-86942011000200005.
5
Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise.接触枪击噪音后听力的暂时变化。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004;17(2):285-93.
6
Comparison of muzzle suppression and ear-level hearing protection in firearm use.枪口抑制与耳部听力保护在枪械使用中的比较。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jun;144(6):950-3. doi: 10.1177/0194599811398872. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
7
[Evaluation of the risk on hearing loss at soldiers].[士兵听力损失风险评估]
Otolaryngol Pol. 2006;60(2):249-53.
8
Occupational Noise Exposure and Longitudinal Hearing Changes in Post-9/11 US Military Personnel During an Initial Period of Military Service.职业性噪声暴露与“9·11”后美国军人在兵役初期的纵向听力变化。
Ear Hear. 2021 Sep/Oct;42(5):1163-1172. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001008.
9
The influence of military service on auditory health and the efficacy of a Hearing Conservation Program.兵役对听觉健康的影响及听力保护计划的效果。
Noise Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;13(53):320-7. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.82965.
10
Noise-induced hearing loss caused by gunshot in South Korean military service.韩国军队中枪伤所致噪声性听力损失
Mil Med. 2007 Apr;172(4):421-5. doi: 10.7205/milmed.172.4.421.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a clinical investigation protocol for occupational auditory health.职业听觉健康临床研究方案的制定。
Rev Bras Med Trab. 2024 Aug 5;22(1):e20231189. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2023-1189. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
2
Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Police Officers: Systematic Review.警察中噪声性听力损失:系统评价
Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Sep;34(124):211-218. doi: 10.22038/IJORL.2022.64036.3198.
3
Hearing loss among military personnel in relation to occupational and leisure noise exposure and usage of personal protective equipment.

本文引用的文献

1
Hearing loss in veterans and the need for hearing loss prevention programs.退伍军人的听力损失以及听力损失预防项目的必要性。
Noise Health. 2009 Jan-Mar;11(42):14-21. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.45308.
2
[Occupational risk management in the Brazilian army: normative and practical aspects].[巴西军队中的职业风险管理:规范与实践层面]
Cad Saude Publica. 2007 Sep;23(9):2127-33. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2007000900020.
3
Knowledge and attitude of infantry soldiers to hearing conservation.步兵对听力保护的知识与态度。
军事人员职业性和休闲性噪声暴露与听力损失及个人防护设备使用的关系。
Noise Health. 2020 Oct-Dec;22(107):90-98. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_12_19.
4
Work-Related Noise Exposure in a Cohort of Patients with Chronic Tinnitus: Analysis of Demographic and Audiological Characteristics.一组慢性耳鸣患者的职业性噪声暴露:人口统计学和听力学特征分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Sep 8;14(9):1035. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14091035.
5
Hearing loss in the Royal Norwegian Navy: A longitudinal study.挪威皇家海军的听力损失:一项纵向研究。
Noise Health. 2016 May-Jun;18(82):157-65. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.181999.
6
Exposure to classroom sound pressure level among dance teachers in Porto Alegre (RS).阿雷格里港(南里奥格兰德州)舞蹈教师接触教室声压级的情况。
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jan;17(1):20-5. doi: 10.7162/S1809-97772013000100004.
7
Evaluation of hearing protection used by police officers in the shooting range.评估警察在射击场使用的听力保护装置。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Nov-Dec;80(6):515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
8
Associations between dietary quality, noise, and hearing: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2002.饮食质量、噪音与听力之间的关联:来自1999 - 2002年美国国家健康与营养检查调查的数据。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Nov;53(11):796-809. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.921340. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
Mil Med. 2007 May;172(5):520-2. doi: 10.7205/milmed.172.5.520.
4
The effect of impulse noise on distortion product otoacoustic emissions.脉冲噪声对畸变产物耳声发射的影响。
Int J Audiol. 2005 Sep;44(9):540-9. doi: 10.1080/14992020500190201.
5
Effects of impulse noise on transiently evoked otoacoustic emission in soldiers.脉冲噪声对士兵瞬态诱发耳声发射的影响。
Int J Audiol. 2005 Jan;44(1):3-7. doi: 10.1080/14992020400022561.
6
Detection and Clinical Diagnosis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss by Otoacoustic Emissions.通过耳声发射检测噪声性听力损失及临床诊断
Noise Health. 2001;3(12):19-31.
7
Prevention of noise-induced hearing loss in the Canadian military.加拿大军队中噪声性听力损失的预防
J Otolaryngol. 1995 Oct;24(5):271-80.
8
Prolonged exposure to gunfire noise among professional soldiers.职业军人长期暴露于枪炮噪声环境中。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994 Apr;20(2):87-92. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1416.
9
Hearing loss and impulse noise during military service.服役期间的听力损失与脉冲噪声
Scand Audiol Suppl. 1980 Aug(Suppl 12):292-7.