Rosenberg Dori E, Kerr Jacqueline, Sallis James F, Norman Gregory J, Calfas Karen, Patrick Kevin
Group Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative Seattle, WA, USA.
J Aging Phys Act. 2012 Jul;20(3):379-94. doi: 10.1123/japa.20.3.379. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
The authors tested the feasibility and acceptability, and explored the outcomes, of 2 walking interventions based on ecological models among older adults living in retirement communities. An enhanced intervention (EI) was compared with a standard walking intervention (SI) among residents in 4 retirement facilities (N = 87 at baseline; mean age = 84.1 yr). All participants received a walking intervention including pedometers, printed materials, and biweekly group sessions. EI participants also received phone counseling and environmental-awareness components. Measures included pedometer step counts, activities of daily living, environment-related variables, physical function, depression, cognitive function, satisfaction, and adherence. Results indicated improvements among the total sample for step counts, neighborhood barriers, cognitive function, and satisfaction with walking opportunities. Satisfaction and adherence were high. Both walking interventions were feasible to implement among facility-dwelling older adults. Future studies can build on this multilevel approach.
作者测试了基于生态模型的两种步行干预措施在退休社区老年人中的可行性和可接受性,并探究了其效果。在4个退休设施中,将强化干预(EI)与标准步行干预(SI)在居民中进行比较(基线时N = 87;平均年龄 = 84.1岁)。所有参与者都接受了包括计步器、印刷材料和每两周一次小组课程的步行干预。EI参与者还接受了电话咨询和环境意识方面的内容。测量指标包括计步器步数、日常生活活动、与环境相关的变量、身体功能、抑郁、认知功能、满意度和依从性。结果表明,总样本在步数、邻里障碍、认知功能以及对步行机会的满意度方面有所改善。满意度和依从性较高。两种步行干预措施在居住在设施中的老年人中实施都是可行的。未来的研究可以基于这种多层次方法展开。