Bowles Kathryn H, Hanlon Alexandra L, Glick Henry A, Naylor Mary D, O'Connor Melissa, Riegel Barbara, Shih Nai-Wei, Weiner Mark G
University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, 418 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Int J Telemed Appl. 2011;2011:540138. doi: 10.1155/2011/540138. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
Background. Hospitalization accounts for 70% of heart failure (HF) costs; readmission rates at 30 days are 24% and rise to 50% by 90 days. Agencies anticipate that telehomecare will provide the close monitoring necessary to prevent HF readmissions. Methods and Results. Randomized controlled trial to compare a telehomecare intervention for patients 55 and older following hospital discharge for HF to usual skilled home care. Primary endpoints were 30- and 60-day all-cause and HF readmission, hospital days, and time to readmission or death. Secondary outcomes were access to care, emergency department (ED) use, and satisfaction with care. All-cause readmissions at 30 days (16% versus 19%) and over six months (46% versus 52%) were lower in the telehomecare group but were not statistically significant. Access to care and satisfaction were significantly higher for the telehomecare patients, including the number of in-person visits and days in home care. Conclusions. Patient acceptance of the technology and current home care policies and processes of care were barriers to gaining clinical effectiveness and efficiency.
背景。住院治疗占心力衰竭(HF)费用的70%;30天再入院率为24%,到90天时升至50%。相关机构预计远程家庭护理将提供预防HF再入院所需的密切监测。方法与结果。进行随机对照试验,以比较针对55岁及以上因HF出院患者的远程家庭护理干预与常规专业家庭护理。主要终点为30天和60天的全因再入院和HF再入院、住院天数以及再入院或死亡时间。次要结局为获得护理的机会、急诊室(ED)就诊情况以及对护理的满意度。远程家庭护理组30天(16%对19%)和六个月以上(46%对52%)的全因再入院率较低,但无统计学意义。远程家庭护理患者获得护理的机会和满意度显著更高,包括面对面就诊次数和家庭护理天数。结论。患者对该技术的接受程度以及当前的家庭护理政策和护理流程是实现临床有效性和效率的障碍。