Suppr超能文献

异常的术前检查、病史的病理发现,及其对围手术期并发症的预测价值。

Abnormal pre-operative tests, pathologic findings of medical history, and their predictive value for perioperative complications.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):339-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02593.x. Epub 2011 Dec 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laboratory tests, electrocardiogram (ECG) and chest X-rays still serve as part of the routine assessment before elective surgery in many institutions, even though there is little evidence of their predictive value relating to perioperative complications. This study investigates the correlation of abnormal findings in pre-operative tests and pathologic findings in the medical history with perioperative complications.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for elective surgery in a secondary care hospital were included in this prospective cohort study. Abnormal pre-operative tests, significant findings from the medical history and perioperative complications were recorded. Regression analysis was performed in order to identify the strongest predictors for perioperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 1363 (56.1% female) patients were consecutively included in this study. The percentage of abnormalities in pre-operative tests ranged from 1.6% (electrolytes) and 29.7% (echocardiography). Eighty-six (6.3%) patients had at least one perioperative complication. The most frequent complications were hypo- or hypertension in 55 cases (4.0%), followed by 20 patients (1.5%) who suffered from hemodynamically relevant cardiac dysrhythmias such as supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia, bradycardia and ventricular extrasystoles. The binary logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of perioperative complications showed significant results for age, invasiveness of the procedure, history of renal disease or anemia and abnormal ECG.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that age, type of surgery and medical history are appropriate predictors of perioperative complications, whereas abnormalities in laboratory tests seem to have restricted ability in predicting adverse perioperative outcome.

摘要

背景

尽管实验室检查、心电图(ECG)和胸部 X 光检查在许多机构中仍然是择期手术前常规评估的一部分,但几乎没有证据表明它们与围手术期并发症有关的预测价值。本研究调查了术前检查中的异常发现与病史中的病理发现与围手术期并发症之间的相关性。

方法

本前瞻性队列研究纳入了一家二级保健医院择期手术的患者。记录了术前检查异常、病史中的重要发现和围手术期并发症。为了确定围手术期并发症的最强预测因素,进行了回归分析。

结果

共有 1363 名(56.1%为女性)患者连续纳入本研究。术前检查异常的百分比范围从 1.6%(电解质)到 29.7%(超声心动图)。86 名(6.3%)患者至少发生了一次围手术期并发症。最常见的并发症是 55 例(4.0%)低血压或高血压,其次是 20 例(1.5%)患者出现与血流动力学相关的心律失常,如室上性心动过速、室性心动过速、心动过缓和室性期前收缩。识别围手术期并发症预测因素的二元逻辑回归分析显示,年龄、手术类型、肾功能不全或贫血病史以及异常心电图具有显著意义。

结论

我们的结果表明,年龄、手术类型和病史是围手术期并发症的合适预测因素,而实验室检查异常似乎预测不良围手术期结局的能力有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验