Suppr超能文献

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者长期氧疗的长期随访。

Long-term follow-up of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients on long-term oxygen treatment.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Turgut Ozal Research Center, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2012 Feb;66(2):152-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02833.x. Epub 2011 Dec 20.

Abstract

AIMS

Few studies exist on influence of long-term oxygen treatment (LTOT) on survival of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. This study was designed to determine whether LTOT improves survival or not in severely hypoxaemic COPD patients.

MATERIALS

COPD patients prescribed oxygen concentrator were consecutively included. Patients' baseline characteristics were noted. During follow-up, patients were divided into three groups according to LTOT utilisation: (i) non-utilisers, (ii) intermittent utilisers (< 15 h/day) and (iii) true utilisers (≥ 15 h/day). Patients' status (live or death) and, if died, the date of death were checked throughout the study. The factors which might influence mortality during 5-year period were analysed.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and twenty-eight patients completed the study. Of these patients, 55 were in Group 1, 112 were in Group 2 and 61 were in Group 3. Regarding the initial characteristics, there was not any significant difference between groups. Mean follow-up for whole group was 27.8 ± 18.5 months. Median survivals were similar between groups (19.5 ± 5.6, 32.5 ± 4.1 and 30.0 ± 5.7 months respectively) (p > 0.05). Compared with Group 1, survival was improved in Group 2 (p < 0.05) and there was a positive trend for Group 3 during first 2-year period. However, this improvement disappeared during further follow-up. Analysis of multiple factors which might influence mortality during 5-year period did not yield statistically significant parameter.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

We found that, regarding survival, any kind of LTOT proved to be beneficial over no LTOT only in the first 2 years of follow-up, and that there was not any difference between intermittent and true LTOT utilisation.

摘要

目的

关于长期氧疗 (LTOT) 对慢性阻塞性肺疾病 (COPD) 患者生存的影响,研究甚少。本研究旨在确定 LTOT 是否能改善严重低氧血症 COPD 患者的生存。

材料

连续纳入接受氧气浓缩器治疗的 COPD 患者。记录患者的基线特征。在随访期间,根据 LTOT 的使用情况将患者分为三组:(i)未使用者,(ii)间歇性使用者(<15 小时/天)和(iii)真正使用者(≥15 小时/天)。在整个研究过程中,检查患者的状态(存活或死亡)以及如果死亡,则死亡日期。分析了 5 年内可能影响死亡率的因素。

结果

228 例患者完成了研究。其中,55 例患者在第 1 组,112 例患者在第 2 组,61 例患者在第 3 组。就初始特征而言,各组之间无显著差异。整个组的平均随访时间为 27.8±18.5 个月。各组的中位生存期相似(分别为 19.5±5.6、32.5±4.1 和 30.0±5.7 个月)(p>0.05)。与第 1 组相比,第 2 组的生存得到改善(p<0.05),第 3 组在前 2 年期间呈积极趋势。然而,这种改善在进一步随访中消失。对 5 年内可能影响死亡率的多种因素进行分析,未得出统计学意义的参数。

讨论和结论

我们发现,就生存而言,LTOT 比不使用 LTOT 仅在随访的前 2 年有益,且间歇性和真正的 LTOT 使用之间没有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验