• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于多学科研究团队中知识中介作用的思考。

Reflections on knowledge brokering within a multidisciplinary research team.

作者信息

Urquhart Robin, Porter Geoffrey A, Grunfeld Eva

机构信息

Cancer Outcomes Research Program, Cancer Care Nova Scotia, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9.

出版信息

J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2011 Fall;31(4):283-90. doi: 10.1002/chp.20128.

DOI:10.1002/chp.20128
PMID:22189993
Abstract

Knowledge brokering (KB) may be one approach of helping researchers and decision makers effectively communicate their needs and abilities, and move toward increased use of evidence in health care. A multidisciplinary research team in Nova Scotia, Canada, has created a dedicated KB position with the goal of improving access to quality colorectal cancer care. The purpose of this paper is to provide an in-progress perspective on KB within this large research team. A KB position ("knowledge broker") was created to perform two primary tasks: (1) facilitate ongoing communication among team members; and (2) develop and maintain collaborations between researchers and decision makers to establish partnerships for the transfer and use of research findings. In this article, we discuss our KB model and its implementation, describe the broker's functions and activities, and present preliminary outcomes. The primary functions of the KB position have included: sustaining team members' engagement; harnessing members' expertise and sharing it with others; developing and maintaining communication tools/strategies; and establishing collaborations between team members and other stakeholders working in cancer care. The broker has facilitated an integrated knowledge translation approach to research conduct and led to the development of new collaborations with external stakeholders and other cancer/health services researchers. KB roles will undoubtedly differ across contexts. However, descriptive assessments can help others determine whether such an approach could be valuable for their research programs and, if so, what to expect during the process.

摘要

知识中介(KB)可能是帮助研究人员和决策者有效沟通其需求与能力,并推动在医疗保健中更多地使用证据的一种方法。加拿大新斯科舍省的一个多学科研究团队设立了一个专门的知识中介职位,目标是改善优质结直肠癌护理的可及性。本文旨在提供该大型研究团队内部知识中介工作进展情况的视角。设立了一个知识中介职位(“知识经纪人”)来执行两项主要任务:(1)促进团队成员之间的持续沟通;(2)发展并维持研究人员与决策者之间的合作关系,以建立研究结果转移和使用的伙伴关系。在本文中,我们讨论我们的知识中介模式及其实施情况,描述经纪人的职能和活动,并展示初步成果。知识中介职位的主要职能包括:保持团队成员的参与度;利用成员的专业知识并与他人分享;开发并维护沟通工具/策略;以及在团队成员与从事癌症护理工作的其他利益相关者之间建立合作关系。该经纪人推动了一种综合知识转化方法用于研究开展,并促成了与外部利益相关者及其他癌症/卫生服务研究人员的新合作关系的发展。知识中介的角色无疑会因背景而异。然而,描述性评估可以帮助其他人确定这种方法对他们的研究项目是否有价值,如果有价值,在这个过程中可以期待什么。

相似文献

1
Reflections on knowledge brokering within a multidisciplinary research team.关于多学科研究团队中知识中介作用的思考。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2011 Fall;31(4):283-90. doi: 10.1002/chp.20128.
2
The Maritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit (MSSU) Bridge Process: An Integrated Knowledge Translation Approach to Address Priority Health Issues and Increase Collaborative Research in Nova Scotia, Canada.海洋 SPOR 支持单位 (MSSU) 桥梁流程:一种综合知识转化方法,用于解决加拿大新斯科舍省的优先健康问题并增加合作研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:6901. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6901. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
A Knowledge Brokering Program in Burkina Faso (West Africa): Reflections from Our Experience.布基纳法索(西非)的一个知识中介项目:我们的经验反思
Health Syst Reform. 2016 Oct 1;2(4):367-372. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2016.1202368.
5
Identifying strategies to support implementation of interprofessional primary care teams in Nova Scotia: Results of a survey and knowledge sharing event.识别策略以支持新斯科舍省跨专业初级保健团队的实施:调查和知识共享活动的结果。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 10;25(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02399-0.
6
The Multidisciplinary Translational Team (MTT) Model for Training and Development of Translational Research Investigators.用于培训和发展转化研究人员的多学科转化团队(MTT)模式
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Oct;8(5):533-41. doi: 10.1111/cts.12281. Epub 2015 May 23.
7
A health knowledge brokering intervention in a district of Burkina Faso: A qualitative retrospective implementation analysis.布基纳法索一地区的健康知识中介干预:定性回顾性实施分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 26;14(7):e0220105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220105. eCollection 2019.
8
Knowledge brokering in public health: a tale of two studies.公共卫生中的知识中介:两项研究的故事。
Public Health. 2014 Jun;128(6):533-44. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.01.015. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
9
Partnering with mental health providers: a guide for services researchers.与心理健康服务提供者合作:服务研究人员指南。
J Ment Health. 2012 Oct;21(5):469-77. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2012.705923.
10
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.

引用本文的文献

1
An exploratory qualitative study of inter-agency health and social service partnerships focused on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients.一项针对以原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民为服务对象的跨机构健康与社会服务伙伴关系的探索性定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1576. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11656-y.
2
Primary healthcare provider experience of knowledge brokering interventions for mood management.基层医疗服务提供者对情绪管理知识传播干预措施的体验。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2023 Oct 5;11(1):2265136. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2023.2265136. eCollection 2023.
3
A critical realist synthesis of cross-disciplinary health policy and systems research: defining characteristic features, developing an evaluation framework and identifying challenges.
跨学科卫生政策和系统研究的关键现实主义综合:定义特征、制定评估框架和确定挑战。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jul 14;18(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00556-2.
4
A mixed methods examination of knowledge brokers and their use of theoretical frameworks and evaluative practices.混合方法研究知识经纪人及其对理论框架和评估实践的运用。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Mar 27;18(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0545-8.
5
Collaborative health research partnerships: a survey of researcher and knowledge-user attitudes and perceptions.合作式健康研究伙伴关系:对研究人员和知识使用者态度及认知的调查。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Nov 27;17(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0485-3.
6
A health knowledge brokering intervention in a district of Burkina Faso: A qualitative retrospective implementation analysis.布基纳法索一地区的健康知识中介干预:定性回顾性实施分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 26;14(7):e0220105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220105. eCollection 2019.
7
A description of a tailored knowledge translation intervention delivered by knowledge brokers within public health departments in Canada.描述加拿大公共卫生部门的知识经纪人实施的定制知识转化干预措施。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jun 20;17(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0460-z.
8
Key components of knowledge transfer and exchange in health services research: Findings from a systematic scoping review.卫生服务研究中知识转移和交流的关键组成部分:系统范围综述的结果。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Feb;75(2):313-326. doi: 10.1111/jan.13836. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
9
The value of program science to optimize knowledge brokering on infectious diseases for public health.规划科学在优化传染病知识传播以促进公共卫生方面的价值。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 2;18(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5493-7.
10
The 'dark side' of knowledge brokering.知识中介的“阴暗面”。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2017 Apr;22(2):107-112. doi: 10.1177/1355819616653981. Epub 2016 Jul 7.