Ocala Oncology, Ocala, FL 34474, USA.
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2012 Sep;11(3):155-66. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) involves the use of active cytotoxic drugs (irinotecan, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil [5-FU], and capecitabine) and biological agents (bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab) either in combination or as single agents. Until recently, the only biological agent with proven first-line efficacy was bevacizumab, but options have expanded from the data generated with anti-endothelial growth factor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies. Anti-EGFR agents can be added to first-line FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin [folinic acid], irinotecan) or FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin [folinic acid], oxaliplatin) in patients whose tumors express wild-type KRAS. These agents may improve outcomes when added to chemotherapy, particularly progression-free survival (PFS), and in the case of cetuximab, overall survival (OS) and response rates. The selection of first-line therapy should be based on the individual treatment goals after considering the efficacy and tolerability of each regimen. For patients with metastases confined to the liver, surgical resection offers a potentially curative approach. For initially unresectable lesions, treatment regimens offering high response rates may produce sufficient tumor shrinkage to permit complete resection. Regimens with high response rates are also preferable for patients requiring symptom relief or for those with large tumor burdens. The choice between intensive vs. nonintensive management also depends on other factors, including the patient's functional status, comorbidities, and desires. A sequential single-agent strategy or an intermittent approach (combination therapy followed by maintenance) may minimize toxicity and be appropriate for patients who are not surgical candidates, irrespective of treatment response. Guidelines, such as those of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), recommend that KRAS mutational status should be determined at mCRC diagnosis to identify candidates for anti-EGFR therapy whether they are used in first or subsequent lines of treatment.
转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的治疗包括使用活性细胞毒性药物(伊立替康、奥沙利铂、5-氟尿嘧啶[5-FU]和卡培他滨)和生物制剂(贝伐珠单抗、西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗),无论是联合使用还是单独使用。直到最近,唯一具有明确一线疗效的生物制剂是贝伐珠单抗,但随着抗血管内皮生长因子(EGFR)单克隆抗体数据的出现,选择范围已经扩大。在肿瘤表达野生型 KRAS 的患者中,抗 EGFR 药物可添加到一线 FOLFIRI(5-氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙[甲酰四氢叶酸]、伊立替康)或 FOLFOX(5-氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙[甲酰四氢叶酸]、奥沙利铂)中。这些药物在添加到化疗中时可能会改善结果,特别是无进展生存期(PFS),并且在西妥昔单抗的情况下,总生存期(OS)和反应率也会改善。在考虑每个方案的疗效和耐受性后,应根据个体治疗目标选择一线治疗。对于仅局限于肝脏的转移患者,手术切除提供了一种潜在的治愈方法。对于最初不可切除的病变,提供高反应率的治疗方案可能会使肿瘤足够缩小,从而实现完全切除。对于需要缓解症状或肿瘤负荷较大的患者,高反应率的方案也是首选。强化与非强化管理之间的选择还取决于其他因素,包括患者的功能状态、合并症和愿望。序贯单药策略或间歇性方法(联合治疗后维持)可能会最小化毒性,并且适用于无论治疗反应如何,均不适合手术的患者。指南,如国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)的指南,建议在 mCRC 诊断时确定 KRAS 突变状态,以确定抗 EGFR 治疗的候选者,无论它们是在一线还是后续治疗中使用。