• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Colorectal cancer diagnosis improvement project evaluation demonstrates the importance of using multiple measures to track progress toward timeliness goals.

作者信息

Partin Melissa R, Powell Adam A, Nugent Sean, Ordin Diana L

机构信息

Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Healthc Qual. 2013 May-Jun;35(3):41-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00188.x. Epub 2011 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00188.x
PMID:22192595
Abstract

Using data from an improvement collaborative, we examined whether facility-specific conclusions regarding the success of efforts to improve timely access could vary depending on the type of measure used. The sample was drawn from 21 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) medical facilities participating in a collaborative on timely diagnostic evaluation following positive fecal occult blood tests (FOBT+). We identified FOBT+ cases from participating facilities between September 2004 and August 2005 (precollaborative), and September 2006-August 2007 (postcollaborative). Dates of FOBT+ results, colonoscopy, and death were extracted from VHA medical records. We estimated the cumulative proportion receiving colonoscopy within 2 months of the FOBT+ (target measure established by collaborative), and compared facility-specific results regarding improvement on this measure to results from measures of the cumulative proportion receiving colonoscopy within 12 months, and average time-to-colonoscopy. In 12 facilities (57%), all measures suggested consistent results regarding pre-post collaborative changes in colonoscopy rates. In four facilities (19%), the target measure suggested less favorable change, and in five (24%), more favorable change than one or both other measures. Because conclusions drawn about the success of QI efforts can vary by the measure used, multiple measures should be employed to track progress toward timeliness goals.

摘要

相似文献

1
Colorectal cancer diagnosis improvement project evaluation demonstrates the importance of using multiple measures to track progress toward timeliness goals.
J Healthc Qual. 2013 May-Jun;35(3):41-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00188.x. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
2
Evaluation of a VHA collaborative to improve follow-up after a positive colorectal cancer screening test.评价 VHA 协作以改善结直肠癌筛查阳性后的随访。
Med Care. 2011 Oct;49(10):897-903. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182204944.
3
Timely follow-up of positive fecal occult blood tests strategies associated with improvement.对粪便潜血试验阳性结果进行及时随访的策略与改善情况相关。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Aug;37(2):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.05.013. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
4
Contribution of patient, physician, and environmental factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up for abnormal colorectal cancer screening test results.患者、医生及环境因素对结直肠癌筛查异常结果结肠镜随访中人口统计学及健康差异的影响。
Cancer. 2017 Sep 15;123(18):3502-3512. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30765. Epub 2017 May 11.
5
Levels and variation in overuse of fecal occult blood testing in the Veterans Health Administration.在退伍军人健康管理局中,粪便潜血检测过度使用的水平和变化。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Dec;27(12):1618-25. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2163-9. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
6
Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results.采用多方面方法改善粪便潜血试验阳性结果的后续跟进。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr;104(4):942-52. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.55. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
7
Inappropriate colorectal cancer screening: findings and implications.不适当的结直肠癌筛查:结果与影响
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;100(11):2526-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00322.x.
8
[Colonoscopy for early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer].[结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌的早期检测与预防]
Harefuah. 2010 Aug;149(8):535-6, 549.
9
Measuring the quality of colorectal cancer screening: the importance of follow-up.衡量结直肠癌筛查的质量:随访的重要性。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Jul;49(7):1002-10. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0533-2.
10
European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Evaluation and interpretation of screening outcomes.欧洲结直肠癌筛查和诊断质量保证指南。第一版——筛查结果的评估和解释。
Endoscopy. 2012 Sep;44 Suppl 3:SE49-64. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1309788. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Time to Follow-up After Colorectal Cancer Screening by Health Insurance Type.不同医保类型的结直肠癌筛查后随访时间。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 May;56(5):e143-e152. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.01.005.
2
Race/Ethnicity and Adoption of a Population Health Management Approach to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Community-Based Healthcare System.种族/族裔与社区医疗系统中采用人群健康管理方法进行结直肠癌筛查
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Nov;31(11):1323-1330. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3792-1. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
3
Follow-Up of Abnormal Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening by Race/Ethnicity.
按种族/族裔对异常乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查的随访。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):507-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.017. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
4
An examination of racial differences in process and outcome of colorectal cancer care quality among users of the veterans affairs health care system.考察退伍军人事务医疗保健系统使用者的结直肠癌护理质量的过程和结果中的种族差异。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2013 Dec;12(4):255-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2013.06.004. Epub 2013 Aug 27.