Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(6):R213. doi: 10.1186/ar3546. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
The induction of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) or anti-double-stranded (ds) -DNA antibodies (Abs) after infliximab (IFX) therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a well-known phenomenon, but the correlation of such Abs with the clinical response to IFX has not yet been determined. The aims of this retrospective observational study were to examine the prevalence of positive ANA and anti-ds-DNA Abs before and after IFX therapy in patients with RA and to investigate whether an increased titer of such Abs is associated with the clinical efficacy of IFX.
One hundred eleven RA patients who had received IFX were studied. ANA (indirect immunofluorescence with HEp-2 cells) and anti-ds-DNA Abs (Farr assay) results were examined before and after IFX therapy.
The overall clinical response assessed by EULAR response criteria was as follows: good response in 55%, including remission in 38%; moderate response in 18%; and no response (NOR) in 27%. The positivity of ANA (≥ 1:160) and anti-ds-DNA Abs significantly increased from 25% to 40% (P = 0.03) and from 3% to 26% (P < 0.001) after IFX, respectively. EULAR response differed significantly according to the ANA titer before IFX (P = 0.001), and the efficacy of IFX became worse as the ANA titer before starting IFX increased. Furthermore, the differences in the clinical response of the ANA titer before IFX ≤ 1:80 and ≥ 1:160 were significant (good, moderate, and no response were 66%, 9%, and 25% in ≤ 1:80 group versus 26%, 33%, 41% in ≥ 1:160 group, respectively; P < 0.001). In 13 patients whose ANA had increased after IFX, 10 showed NOR, only one showed a good response, and none reached remission. These clinical responses were significantly different from ANA no-change patients. In 21 patients with positive anti-ds-DNA Abs after IFX, 16 showed NOR, only two showed a good response, and none reached remission.
The present study suggests that the ANA titer before starting IFX predicts the clinical response to IFX. The increased titers of ANA or anti-ds-DNA Abs after IFX may be useful markers of NOR.
在类风湿关节炎(RA)患者接受英夫利昔单抗(IFX)治疗后,诱导抗核抗体(ANA)或抗双链(ds)-DNA 抗体(Abs)是一种众所周知的现象,但这些 Abs 与 IFX 临床反应的相关性尚未确定。本回顾性观察研究的目的是检查 RA 患者在接受 IFX 治疗前后 ANA 和抗 ds-DNA Abs 的阳性率,并探讨这些 Abs 滴度的增加是否与 IFX 的临床疗效相关。
研究了 111 名接受 IFX 治疗的 RA 患者。在接受 IFX 治疗前后,我们检查了 ANA(间接免疫荧光法用 HEp-2 细胞)和抗 ds-DNA Abs(Farr 测定法)的结果。
根据 EULAR 反应标准评估的总体临床反应如下:55%的患者有良好反应,包括 38%的缓解;18%的患者有中度反应;27%的患者没有反应(NOR)。ANA(≥1:160)和抗 ds-DNA Abs 的阳性率分别从治疗前的 25%增加到 40%(P=0.03)和从 3%增加到 26%(P<0.001)。在 IFX 治疗前,ANA 滴度的变化与 EULAR 反应有显著差异(P=0.001),ANA 滴度越高,IFX 治疗的效果越差。此外,IFX 治疗前 ANA 滴度的临床反应差异显著(IFX 治疗前 ANA 滴度≤1:80 组和≥1:160 组的良好、中度和无反应率分别为 66%、9%和 25%和 26%、33%和 41%;P<0.001)。在 13 名 IFX 治疗后 ANA 升高的患者中,10 名患者 NOR,1 名患者良好反应,均未缓解。这些临床反应与 ANA 无变化患者有显著差异。在 21 名 IFX 治疗后抗 ds-DNA Abs 阳性的患者中,16 名患者 NOR,2 名患者良好反应,均未缓解。
本研究表明,IFX 治疗前的 ANA 滴度可以预测 IFX 的临床反应。IFX 治疗后 ANA 或抗 ds-DNA Abs 滴度的增加可能是 NOR 的有用标志物。