Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lubeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lubeck, Germany.
Strahlenther Onkol. 2012 Jan;188(1):42-8. doi: 10.1007/s00066-011-0005-z. Epub 2011 Dec 24.
The optimal radiochemotherapy regimen for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is controversial. In most cases, platin-based chemotherapy regimens are used. However, uncertainty exists whether cisplatin or carboplatin is the better choice. This retrospective study compared radiochemotherapy with either cisplatin or carboplatin in patients with locally advanced SCC of the oropharynx and oral cavity.
Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of two courses of cisplatin (20 mg/m(2) on days 1-5 and days 29 - 33; n = 65) or two courses of carboplatin (AUC 1.5 on days 1-5 and days 29 - 33; n = 41). Both regimens were retrospectively compared for locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Thirteen additional potential prognostic factors were evaluated including age, gender, ECOG performance status, tumor site, histologic grade, T/N category, AJCC stage, year of treatment, extent of resection, interval between surgery and RT, completion of chemotherapy, and radiotherapy breaks.
The 3-year LRC rates were 85% in the cisplatin group and 62% in the carboplatin group, respectively (p = 0.004). The 3-year OS rates were 78% and 51%, respectively (p = 0.001). Acute toxicity (mucositis, skin toxicity, nausea/vomiting, renal toxicity, hematologic toxicity) and late toxicity (xerostomia, neck fibrosis, skin toxicity, lymph edema) rates were not significantly different between the two groups. On multivariate analysis, better LRC was significantly associated with cisplatin (p < 0.001), an ECOG performance status of 0-1 (p = 0.001), and an interval between surgery and RT of ≤ 6 weeks (p = 0.001). Improved OS was significantly associated with cisplatin (p < 0.001) and completion of chemotherapy (p = 0.002).
For adjuvant radiochemotherapy of patients with locally advanced cancer of the oropharynx and oral cavity, cisplatin appears preferable to carboplatin as it resulted in better outcomes without increased toxicity.
头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCCHN)的最佳放化疗方案仍存在争议。大多数情况下,采用铂类为基础的化疗方案。然而,顺铂与卡铂之间的选择仍存在不确定性。本回顾性研究比较了局部晚期口咽和口腔鳞癌患者接受顺铂或卡铂同期放化疗的效果。
同期化疗包括两个周期顺铂(20mg/m2,第 1-5 天及第 29-33 天;n=65)或两个周期卡铂(AUC 1.5,第 1-5 天及第 29-33 天;n=41)。对两组的局部区域控制(LRC)、总生存(OS)和毒性进行回顾性比较。还评估了 13 个其他潜在的预后因素,包括年龄、性别、ECOG 表现状态、肿瘤部位、组织学分级、T/N 分期、AJCC 分期、治疗年份、切除范围、手术与放疗之间的间隔、化疗完成情况和放疗中断。
顺铂组 3 年 LRC 率为 85%,卡铂组为 62%(p=0.004)。顺铂组 3 年 OS 率为 78%,卡铂组为 51%(p=0.001)。两组急性毒性(黏膜炎、皮肤毒性、恶心/呕吐、肾毒性、血液毒性)和晚期毒性(口干、颈部纤维化、皮肤毒性、淋巴水肿)发生率无显著差异。多因素分析显示,LRC 更好与顺铂(p<0.001)、ECOG 表现状态 0-1(p=0.001)和手术与放疗间隔≤6 周(p=0.001)显著相关。OS 改善与顺铂(p<0.001)和完成化疗(p=0.002)显著相关。
对于局部晚期口咽和口腔癌的辅助放化疗,顺铂似乎优于卡铂,因为它能提高疗效而不增加毒性。