• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在英国一家养老院中,使用中的消毒剂与电解水的清洁效果比较。

Comparison of cleaning efficacy between in-use disinfectant and electrolysed water in an English residential care home.

机构信息

Aqualution Systems Ltd, Duns, UK.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2012 Feb;80(2):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.10.015. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2011.10.015
PMID:22196853
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infection control in hospitals and care homes remains a key issue. They are regularly inspected regarding standards of hygiene, but visual assessment does not necessarily correlate with microbial cleanliness. Pathogens can persist in the inanimate environment for extended periods of time.

AIM

This prospective study compared the effectiveness of a novel sanitizer containing electrolysed water, in which the active ingredient is stabilized hypochlorous acid (Aqualution™), with the effectiveness of the quaternary ammonium disinfectant in current use for microbial removal from hand-touch surfaces in a care home. The study had a two-period crossover design.

METHODS

Five surfaces were cleaned daily over a four-week period, with screening swabs taken before and after cleaning. Swabs were cultured in order to compare levels of surface microbial contamination [colony-forming units (cfu)/cm(2)] before and after cleaning with each product.

FINDINGS

Cleaning with electrolysed water reduced the mean surface bacterial load from 2.6 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.30-30.40] cfu/cm(2) to 0.10 (IQR 0.10-1.40) cfu/cm(2) [mean log(10) reduction factor 1.042, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.30]. Cleaning with the in-use quaternary ammonium disinfectant increased the bacterial load from 0.90 (IQR 0.10-8.50) cfu/cm(2) to 93.30 (IQR 9.85-363.65) cfu/cm(2) (mean log(10) reduction -1.499, 95% CI -1.87 to -1.12) (P < 0.0001). Using two proposed benchmark standards for surface microbial levels in hospitals, electrolysed water resulted in a higher 'pass rate' than the in-use quaternary ammonium disinfectant (80-86% vs 15-21%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Electrolysed water exerts a more effective bacterial kill than the in-use quaternary ammonium disinfectant, which suggests that it may be useful as a surface sanitizer in environments such as care homes.

摘要

背景

医院和养老院的感染控制仍然是一个关键问题。它们经常根据卫生标准进行检查,但目视评估不一定与微生物清洁度相关。病原体可以在无生命的环境中长时间存活。

目的

本前瞻性研究比较了一种新型含电解水消毒剂的效果,其中有效成分是稳定的次氯酸(Aqualution™),与目前用于养老院手触表面微生物去除的季铵盐消毒剂的效果。该研究采用双周期交叉设计。

方法

在四周的时间内,每天清洁五处表面,在清洁前后采集筛查拭子。培养拭子以比较使用每种产品清洁前后表面微生物污染水平[菌落形成单位(cfu)/cm(2)]。

结果

使用电解水清洁可将平均表面细菌负荷从 2.6(四分位间距 [IQR] 0.30-30.40)cfu/cm(2)降低至 0.10(IQR 0.10-1.40)cfu/cm(2) [平均对数(10)减少因子 1.042,95%置信区间(CI)0.79-1.30]。使用市售季铵盐消毒剂清洁会增加细菌负荷,从 0.90(IQR 0.10-8.50)cfu/cm(2)增加至 93.30(IQR 9.85-363.65)cfu/cm(2)(平均对数(10)减少-1.499,95%CI-1.87 至-1.12)(P<0.0001)。使用两种建议的医院表面微生物水平基准标准,电解水的“合格率”高于市售季铵盐消毒剂(80-86%比 15-21%,P<0.0001)。

结论

电解水比市售季铵盐消毒剂更有效地杀灭细菌,这表明它可能在养老院等环境中作为表面消毒剂有用。

相似文献

1
Comparison of cleaning efficacy between in-use disinfectant and electrolysed water in an English residential care home.在英国一家养老院中,使用中的消毒剂与电解水的清洁效果比较。
J Hosp Infect. 2012 Feb;80(2):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.10.015. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
2
Prospective cluster controlled crossover trial to compare the impact of an improved hydrogen peroxide disinfectant and a quaternary ammonium-based disinfectant on surface contamination and health care outcomes.前瞻性群组对照交叉试验比较改良过氧化氢消毒剂和季铵盐类消毒剂对表面污染和卫生保健结果的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Sep 1;45(9):1006-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
3
Routine disinfection of patients' environmental surfaces. Myth or reality?对患者环境表面进行常规消毒。是神话还是现实?
J Hosp Infect. 1999 Jun;42(2):113-7. doi: 10.1053/jhin.1999.0567.
4
Finding a benchmark for monitoring hospital cleanliness.寻找监测医院清洁度的基准。
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Jan;77(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
5
Control of bacterial contamination of washbasin taps and output water using Ecasol: a one-year study.采用 Ecasol 控制面盆龙头和出水的细菌污染:一项为期一年的研究。
J Hosp Infect. 2012 Apr;80(4):288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.01.011. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
6
Effectiveness of disinfectant wipes for decontamination of bacteria on patients' environmental and medical equipment surfaces at Siriraj Hospital.诗里拉吉医院消毒湿巾对患者环境及医疗设备表面细菌的去污效果
J Med Assoc Thai. 2013 Feb;96 Suppl 2:S111-6.
7
Virucidal activity of a quaternary ammonium compound disinfectant against feline calicivirus: a surrogate for norovirus.一种季铵化合物消毒剂对猫杯状病毒的杀病毒活性:作为诺如病毒的替代物
Am J Infect Control. 2006 Jun;34(5):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.11.009.
8
A model system for evaluating surface disinfection in dairy factory environments.用于评估乳制品厂环境表面消毒效果的模型系统。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2010 Feb 28;137(2-3):161-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.028. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
9
Evaluation of the effects of footwear hygiene protocols on nonspecific bacterial contamination of floor surfaces in an equine hospital.评估鞋类卫生规程对一家马医院地面非特异性细菌污染的影响。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006 Apr 1;228(7):1068-73. doi: 10.2460/javma.228.7.1068.
10
Household cleaning and surface disinfection: new insights and strategies.家庭清洁与表面消毒:新见解与策略
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Apr;56 Suppl 2:S70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.12.037.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiological factors associated with the prevalence of mobile genetic elements, and antimicrobial resistance patterns in Klebsiella pneumoniae of farm environments in Bangladesh.与孟加拉国农场环境中肺炎克雷伯菌移动遗传元件流行率及抗菌药物耐药模式相关的流行病学因素。
BMC Med Genomics. 2025 Jul 6;18(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12920-025-02181-w.
2
A Better Disinfectant for Low-Resourced Hospitals? A Multi-Period Cluster Randomised Trial Comparing Hypochlorous Acid with Sodium Hypochlorite in Nigerian Hospitals: The EWASH Trial.一种更适合资源匮乏医院的消毒剂?一项在尼日利亚医院进行的比较次氯酸与次氯酸钠的多阶段整群随机试验:EWASH试验。
Microorganisms. 2022 Apr 26;10(5):910. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10050910.
3
Decontamination effect of neutral electrolysed water for spray nozzles of electric warm-water bidet toilet seats in the healthcare setting.
中性电解水对医疗环境中电动温水坐浴盆喷头的去污效果。
Infect Prev Pract. 2021 Apr 22;3(2):100143. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100143. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
New Clinical Applications of Electrolyzed Water: A Review.电解水的新临床应用:综述
Microorganisms. 2021 Jan 8;9(1):136. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010136.
5
Decontamination of aerosolised bacteria from a pig farm environment using a pH neutral electrochemically activated solution (Ecas4 anolyte).使用 pH 值中性的电化学激活溶液(Ecas4 阳极电解液)对猪场环境中的气溶胶细菌进行净化。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 25;14(9):e0222765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222765. eCollection 2019.
6
High-touch surfaces: microbial neighbours at hand.高接触表面:微生物近在咫尺。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;36(11):2053-2062. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3042-4. Epub 2017 Jun 25.
7
Health technology assessment on super oxidized water for treatment of chronic wounds.超氧化水治疗慢性伤口的卫生技术评估
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 Jun 7;30:384. eCollection 2016.
8
Modern technologies for improving cleaning and disinfection of environmental surfaces in hospitals.改善医院环境表面清洁与消毒的现代技术。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016 Apr 11;5:10. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0111-x. eCollection 2016.
9
Suitability of electrolyzed oxidizing water for the disinfection of hard surfaces and equipment in radiology.电解氧化水在放射科硬表面和设备消毒中的适用性。
J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2015 Jan 28;13(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40201-015-0160-8. eCollection 2015.