School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
J Microbiol Methods. 2012 Feb;88(2):263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.12.005. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) commonly uses the fluorogenic 5' nuclease (TaqMan) and SYBR Green I (SG) detection chemistries to enumerate biomarker genes. Dehalococcoides (Dhc) are keystone bacteria for the detoxification of chlorinated ethenes, and the Dhc 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene serves as a biomarker for monitoring reductive dechlorination in contaminated aquifers. qPCR enumeration of Dhc biomarker genes using the TaqMan or SG approach with the same primer set yielded linear calibration curves over a seven orders of magnitude range with similar amplification efficiencies. The TaqMan assay discriminates specific from nonspecific amplification observed at low template concentrations with the SG assay, and had a 10-fold lower limit of detection of ~3 copies per assay. When applied to Dhc pure cultures and Dhc-containing consortia, both detection methods enumerated Dhc biomarker genes with differences not exceeding 3-fold. Greater variability was observed with groundwater samples, and the SG chemistry produced false-positive results or yielded up to 6-fold higher biomarker gene abundances compared to the TaqMan method. In most cases, the apparent error associated with SG detection resulted from quantification of nonspecific amplification products and was more pronounced with groundwater samples that had low biomarker concentrations or contained PCR inhibitors. Correction of the apparent error using post-amplification melting curve analysis produced 2 to 21-fold lower abundance estimates; however, gel electrophoretic analysis of amplicons demonstrated that melting curve analysis was insufficient to recognize all nonspecific amplification. Upon exclusion of nonspecific amplification products identified by combined melting curve and electrophoretic amplicon analyses, the SG method produced false-negative results compared to the TaqMan method. To achieve sensitive and accurate quantification of Dhc biomarker genes in environmental samples (e.g., groundwater) and avoid erroneous conclusions, the analysis should rely on TaqMan detection chemistry, unless additional analyses validate the results obtained with the SG approach.
定量实时 PCR(qPCR)通常使用荧光 5' 核酸酶(TaqMan)和 SYBR Green I(SG)检测化学物质来计数生物标志物基因。Dehalococcoides(Dhc)是脱氯氯代烯烃解毒的关键细菌,Dhc 16S 核糖体 RNA(rRNA)基因是监测受污染含水层还原脱氯的生物标志物。使用 TaqMan 或 SG 方法,用相同的引物对检测 Dhc 生物标志物基因的 qPCR,在七个数量级范围内产生线性校准曲线,扩增效率相似。TaqMan 测定法在低模板浓度下可区分特异性和非特异性扩增,而 SG 测定法的检测限低 10 倍,约为每个测定 3 个拷贝。当应用于 Dhc 纯培养物和含有 Dhc 的生物群落时,两种检测方法均能计数 Dhc 生物标志物基因,差异不超过 3 倍。地下水样品的变异性更大,SG 化学物质产生假阳性结果,或与 TaqMan 方法相比,生物标志物基因丰度高 6 倍。在大多数情况下,与 SG 检测相关的表观误差源于非特异性扩增产物的定量,并且在具有低生物标志物浓度或含有 PCR 抑制剂的地下水样品中更为明显。使用扩增后熔解曲线分析校正表观误差会产生 2 至 21 倍的丰度估计值;然而,扩增子凝胶电泳分析表明,熔解曲线分析不足以识别所有非特异性扩增。通过联合熔解曲线和电泳扩增子分析排除鉴定的非特异性扩增产物后,SG 方法与 TaqMan 方法相比,产生假阴性结果。为了在环境样品(例如地下水)中实现对 Dhc 生物标志物基因的敏感和准确定量,并避免错误的结论,除非额外的分析验证了 SG 方法获得的结果,否则应依赖 TaqMan 检测化学物质。