The George Washington University, GW Mind-Brain Institute and GW Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Speech and Hearing Science, 2115 G Street NW #204, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Dev Psychol. 2012 Jul;48(4):1165-79. doi: 10.1037/a0026646. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
Four studies using a computerized paradigm investigated whether children's imitation performance is content-specific and to what extent dependent on other cognitive processes such as trial-and-error learning, recall, and observational learning. Experiment 1 showed that 3-year-olds could successfully imitate what we call novel cognitive rules (e.g., first → second → third), which involved responding to 3 different pictures whose spatial configuration varied randomly from trial to trial. However, these same children failed to imitate what we call novel motor-spatial rules (e.g., up → down → right), which involved responding to 3 identical pictures that remained in a fixed spatial configuration from trial to trial. Experiment 2 showed that this dissociation was not due to a general difficulty in encoding motor-spatial content, as children successfully recalled, following a 30-s delay, a new motor-spatial sequence that had been learned by trial and error. Experiment 3 replicated these results and further demonstrated that 3-year-olds can infer a novel motor-spatial sequence following observation of a partially correct and partially incorrect response-a dissociation between imitation and observational learning (or emulation learning). Finally, Experiment 4 presented 3-year-olds with "familiar" motor-spatial sequences that involved making a linear response (e.g., left → middle → right) as well as "novel" motor-spatial sequences (e.g., right → up → down) used in Experiments 1-3 that were nonlinear and always involved a change in direction. Children had no difficulty imitating familiar motor-spatial sequences but again failed to imitate novel motor-spatial sequences. These results suggest that there may be multiple, dissociable imitation learning mechanisms that are content-specific. More importantly, the development of these imitation systems appears to be independent of the operations of other cognitive systems, including trial and error learning, recall, and observational learning.
四项使用计算机范式的研究调查了儿童的模仿表现是否具有特定内容,以及在何种程度上依赖于其他认知过程,如试错学习、回忆和观察学习。实验 1 表明,3 岁儿童可以成功模仿我们所说的新认知规则(例如,第一→第二→第三),这涉及到对 3 张不同的图片做出反应,这些图片的空间配置每次试验都是随机变化的。然而,这些孩子无法模仿我们所说的新的运动空间规则(例如,上→下→右),这涉及到对 3 张始终保持固定空间配置的相同图片做出反应。实验 2 表明,这种分离不是由于编码运动空间内容的一般困难,因为儿童在 30 秒的延迟后成功回忆起通过试错学习的新的运动空间序列。实验 3 复制了这些结果,并进一步表明,3 岁儿童可以在观察部分正确和部分错误的反应后推断出新的运动空间序列——模仿和观察学习(或模仿学习)之间的分离。最后,实验 4 向 3 岁儿童呈现了熟悉的运动空间序列(例如,左→中→右)和新的运动空间序列(例如,右→上→下),这些序列在实验 1-3 中涉及到线性反应,也涉及到非线性反应,总是涉及方向的变化。儿童毫不费力地模仿熟悉的运动空间序列,但再次无法模仿新的运动空间序列。这些结果表明,可能存在多个、可分离的模仿学习机制,这些机制具有特定的内容。更重要的是,这些模仿系统的发展似乎独立于其他认知系统的运作,包括试错学习、回忆和观察学习。