Clinical Instructor, Division of Pharmacy Practice, St. Louis College of Pharmacy, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Jan;46(1):29-34. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q512. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
Studies assessing pharmacist-led services have noted positive clinical diabetes outcomes; however, studies assessing pharmacist impact on glycemic control through insulin titration and adherence to American Diabetes Association (ADA) preventive care measures in an indigent population are limited.
To assess the impact of a pharmacist-managed insulin titration program compared to standard medical care on glycemic control and preventive care measures in an indigent population with diabetes.
This retrospective cohort study compared pharmacist-managed insulin titration to standard care; all patients received primary care services through a county-funded health center serving a low-income minority population. The pharmacist-managed patients, referred by the primary care provider, received telephone calls to assess blood glucose levels, encourage preventive care examinations, and titrate insulin doses through collaborative drug therapy management. Standard care patients received diabetes care solely from the primary care provider. Student t test was used to evaluate the primary outcome, glycemic control, assessed by change in hemoglobin A(1c) (A1C) between groups from baseline to various time points and study end. Secondary outcomes included attainment of preventive care measures and A1C goal of less than 7% and change in weight and total daily insulin dose from baseline to study end.
Sixty-nine patients in the pharmacist-managed group (intervention) and 57 standard care patients (control) were evaluated. The pharmacist-managed group showed a significant difference in A1C at all time points, including, study end, compared to standard care (-1.3% vs -0.18%, respectively; p = 0.001). In addition, the intervention group more often completed the ADA's recommended preventive care measures; all differences were statistically significant.
Pharmacist-provider collaboration can result in significant clinical improvements, including A1C reduction and adherence to preventive care measures, when compared to standard care in a medically underserved population with diabetes.
评估药剂师主导服务的研究表明其对糖尿病患者具有积极的临床效果;然而,在贫困人群中,评估药师通过胰岛素滴定和遵守美国糖尿病协会(ADA)预防保健措施对血糖控制的影响的研究有限。
评估药师管理的胰岛素滴定方案与标准医疗护理相比,对糖尿病贫困人群的血糖控制和预防保健措施的影响。
这项回顾性队列研究比较了药师管理的胰岛素滴定与标准护理;所有患者均通过一家为低收入少数族裔服务的县资助的健康中心接受初级保健服务。药师管理的患者由初级保健提供者转介,通过合作药物治疗管理接受电话咨询,以评估血糖水平、鼓励进行预防保健检查,并调整胰岛素剂量。标准护理患者仅接受初级保健提供者的糖尿病护理。采用 Student t 检验评估主要结局,即通过组间基线至不同时间点和研究结束时糖化血红蛋白(A1C)变化评估血糖控制情况。次要结局包括预防保健措施达标情况和 A1C 目标<7%以及体重和总日胰岛素剂量从基线至研究结束的变化。
评估了 69 名药师管理组(干预组)和 57 名标准护理组(对照组)的患者。与标准护理组相比,药师管理组在所有时间点(包括研究结束时)的 A1C 均有显著差异(分别为-1.3%和-0.18%;p = 0.001)。此外,干预组更常完成 ADA 推荐的预防保健措施,所有差异均具有统计学意义。
在医疗服务不足的糖尿病患者中,与标准护理相比,药师-提供者合作可以显著改善临床效果,包括降低 A1C 和遵守预防保健措施。