• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Managed Diabetes Program in a Primary Care Setting Within an Integrated Health Care System.在综合性医疗保健系统中,评估初级保健环境下药师管理的糖尿病项目。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Feb;24(2):114-122. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.2.114.
2
Estimated Cost-Effectiveness, Cost Benefit, and Risk Reduction Associated with an Endocrinologist-Pharmacist Diabetes Intense Medical Management "Tune-Up" Clinic.估算与内分泌专家-药剂师糖尿病强化医疗管理“调整”诊所相关的成本效益、成本效益和风险降低。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Mar;23(3):318-326. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.3.318.
3
Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Managed Antidiabetic Deprescribing Program in an Integrated Health Care System.评价在一体化医疗体系中由药剂师管理的抗糖尿病药物停用方案。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Aug;25(8):927-934. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.8.927.
4
Pharmacist-Managed Diabetes Center Interventions Ensure Quality and Safety in Elderly Patients.药剂师管理的糖尿病中心干预措施确保老年患者的质量与安全。
Consult Pharm. 2017 May 1;32(5):299-310. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2017.299.
5
Effect of a Virtual Pharmacy Review Program: A Population Health Case Study.虚拟药房审查计划的效果:一项基于人群健康的案例研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Jan;26(1):24-29. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.1.24.
6
Effect of a Pharmacist-Led Program on Improving Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus from Northern Cyprus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.北塞浦路斯药师主导的项目对改善 2 型糖尿病患者结局的效果:一项随机对照试验。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 May;23(5):573-582. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.5.573.
7
The Effect of Clinical Pharmacist-Led Comprehensive Medication Management on Chronic Disease State Goal Attainment in a Patient-Centered Medical Home.临床药师主导的综合药物管理对以患者为中心的医疗之家慢性病状态目标达成的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 May;24(5):423-429. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.5.423.
8
Evaluation of an Academic-Community Partnership to Implement MTM Services in Rural Communities to Improve Pharmaceutical Care for Patients with Diabetes and/or Hypertension.评价学术-社区伙伴关系在农村社区实施药物治疗管理服务以改善糖尿病和/或高血压患者的药物治疗
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Feb;24(2):132-141. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.2.132.
9
Evaluation of an outpatient pharmacy clinical services program on adherence and clinical outcomes among patients with diabetes and/or coronary artery disease.评估门诊药房临床服务项目对糖尿病和/或冠状动脉疾病患者依从性及临床结局的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Oct;20(10):1036-45. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.10.1036.
10
Analysis of Glycemic Control of a Pharmacist-Led Medication Management Program in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病患者中由药剂师主导的药物管理项目的血糖控制分析
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jan;22(1):32-7. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.1.32.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective multicentre study on the outcomes of the pharmacist-managed Diabetes Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic programme in primary health clinics across Johor, Malaysia.一项关于马来西亚柔佛州基层医疗诊所中由药剂师管理的糖尿病药物治疗依从性诊所项目成果的回顾性多中心研究。
Malays Fam Physician. 2025 Jun 24;20:43. doi: 10.51866/oa.767. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of pharmacist-physician collaborative care on hemoglobin A1c and blood pressure quality measure achievement in primary care.药剂师与医生协作护理对初级保健中糖化血红蛋白和血压质量指标达成情况的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Jun;31(6):565-577. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.6.565.
3
Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Pharmacist-Primary Care Provider Collaborative Practice to Usual Care for Diabetes Control in a Family Medicine Clinic.一项回顾性队列研究:比较家庭医学诊所中药师与初级保健提供者协作实践和常规护理对糖尿病控制的效果
Clin Diabetes. 2025 Jan 15;43(2):262-269. doi: 10.2337/cd23-0102. eCollection 2025 Spring.
4
Evaluating Pharmacotherapy Optimization in Pharmacist-Led Management of Type 2 Diabetes Utilizing Continuous Glucose Monitors.利用连续血糖监测评估药师主导的2型糖尿病管理中的药物治疗优化。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251330091. doi: 10.1177/21501319251330091. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
5
Can integrated care interventions strengthen primary care and improve outcomes for patients with chronic diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis.综合护理干预能否加强初级保健并改善慢性病患者的治疗效果?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jan 6;23(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01260-1.
6
Evaluation of remote pharmacist intervention on type 2 diabetes hemoglobin A1c reduction in an accountable care organization.在一个责任医疗组织中评估远程药剂师干预对2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白降低的作用。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024 Jul 23;37(5):774-780. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2024.2379195. eCollection 2024.
7
Integrating Community Care for the Prevention and Treatment of Diabetes.整合社区护理以预防和治疗糖尿病。
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Jun 4;24(2):22. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7607. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
8
Factors associated with glycemic control in patients with T2DM: evidence from a cross-sectional study in China.与 T2DM 患者血糖控制相关的因素:来自中国横断面研究的证据。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2024 Jun 3;24(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12902-024-01605-5.
9
Endocrinology/Primary Care Pharmacy Collaboration vs Endocrinology Care Alone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and A1c >9.2型糖尿病且糖化血红蛋白>9%的患者中,内分泌科/基层医疗药房协作与单纯内分泌科治疗的对比
J Pharm Technol. 2024 Apr;40(2):78-84. doi: 10.1177/87551225231224251. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
10
Characteristics of self-management education and support programmes for people with chronic diseases delivered by primary care teams: a rapid review.基层医疗团队提供的慢性病患者自我管理教育和支持计划的特征:快速综述。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jan 31;25(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02262-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacist Interventions in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.药师干预在 2 型糖尿病管理中的作用:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 May;22(5):493-515. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.5.493.
2
Analysis of Glycemic Control of a Pharmacist-Led Medication Management Program in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病患者中由药剂师主导的药物管理项目的血糖控制分析
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jan;22(1):32-7. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.1.32.
3
1. Strategies for Improving Care.1. 改善护理的策略。
Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39 Suppl 1:S6-12. doi: 10.2337/dc16-S004.
4
The effect of a diabetes collaborative care management program on clinical and economic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.糖尿病协作式护理管理方案对 2 型糖尿病患者临床结局和经济结局的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Jun;21(6):452-68. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.6.452.
5
Expansion of clinical pharmacy through increased use of outpatient pharmacists for anticoagulation services.通过增加门诊药师提供抗凝服务来扩大临床药学服务范围。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Apr 1;72(7):568-72. doi: 10.2146/ajhp140404.
6
The panel management questionnaire: a tool to measure panel management capability.专家小组管理调查问卷:一种衡量专家小组管理能力的工具。
Perm J. 2015 Spring;19(2):4-9. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-170. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
7
Evaluation of an outpatient pharmacy clinical services program on adherence and clinical outcomes among patients with diabetes and/or coronary artery disease.评估门诊药房临床服务项目对糖尿病和/或冠状动脉疾病患者依从性及临床结局的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Oct;20(10):1036-45. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.10.1036.
8
Risk factors contributing to type 2 diabetes and recent advances in the treatment and prevention.2型糖尿病的危险因素及治疗与预防的最新进展。
Int J Med Sci. 2014 Sep 6;11(11):1185-200. doi: 10.7150/ijms.10001. eCollection 2014.
9
Is adherence a relevant issue in the self-management education of diabetes? A mixed narrative review.坚持是否是糖尿病自我管理教育中的一个相关问题?混合叙事综述。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2014 Jul 29;7:357-67. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S36369. eCollection 2014.
10
Comparison of an intensive pharmacist-managed telephone clinic with standard of care for tobacco cessation in a veteran population.在退伍军人人群中,强化药师管理的电话诊所与戒烟标准护理的比较。
Health Promot Pract. 2014 Jul;15(4):512-20. doi: 10.1177/1524839913509816. Epub 2013 Nov 14.

在综合性医疗保健系统中,评估初级保健环境下药师管理的糖尿病项目。

Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Managed Diabetes Program in a Primary Care Setting Within an Integrated Health Care System.

机构信息

1 Kaiser Permanente Downey Medical Center, Downey, California.

2 Drug Information Services and Pharmacy Outcomes Research Group, Kaiser Permanente California Region, Downey, California.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Feb;24(2):114-122. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.2.114.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.2.114
PMID:29384029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10398151/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pharmacists have important roles in managing the therapy of patients with type 2 diabetes and improving patient care. Pharmacists titrate medications; reinforce patient education; and address care gaps, such as medication adherence, vaccinations, and overdue health screenings. Through these efforts and more, pharmacists help to improve patient care and achieve Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures. Thus, it is important to demonstrate improved health outcomes through pharmacist contributions to diabetes management, which can then provide an opportunity to expand the role of clinical pharmacists in other medical centers and practice settings within an integrated health care system.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of a pharmacist-managed program within a primary care setting by determining the percentage of patients who reached the HEDIS goal of hemoglobin A1c (A1c) < 8.0%, the time needed to reach this goal, and A1c reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study identified patients aged 18-74 years who had uncontrolled A1c ≥ 8.0%. Patients in the Complete Care Program (CCP) had their diabetes therapy managed by a pharmacist and were propensity score matched to a comparison group of usual care (UC) patients. Multivariate regression analyses and a Cox proportional hazards model compared the change in A1c from baseline and the time to A1c goal between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the CCP and UC patients (n = 980 patients per group). CCP patients were significantly more likely to achieve the HEDIS goal of A1c < 8% at 3 months (OR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.93-3.10, P < 0.0001) and at 6 months (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.08-1.61, P = 0.007) compared with the UC patients. CCP patients also reached the A1c goal significantly faster: 3.4 months versus 4.6 months (P < 0.0001), even after controlling for covariates (HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.09-1.41, P = 0.001). Change in baseline A1c was -0.95% versus -0.54% (P < 0.0001) at 3 months and -1.19% versus -0.99% (P = 0.008) at 6 months for CCP versus UC patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Type 2 diabetes therapy management by clinical pharmacists was associated with a greater percentage of patients achieving the HEDIS goal of A1c < 8.0%, reaching the A1c goal faster, and a greater A1c reduction from baseline at 3 and 6 months of follow-up compared with patients receiving usual care.

DISCLOSURES

No funding was provided to support this research study. The authors report no potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article. All authors contributed to the study concept and design. Benedict and Spence performed data analysis and interpretation. The manuscript was written by Benedict, with assistance from Spence and Rashid. All authors reviewed and contributed to manuscript revisions. Spence is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Parts of this study were presented at the AMCP Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting; San Francisco, California; April 19-22, 2016.

摘要

背景

药剂师在管理 2 型糖尿病患者的治疗和改善患者护理方面发挥着重要作用。药剂师可以调整药物剂量;加强患者教育;并解决护理缺口问题,如药物依从性、疫苗接种和逾期健康检查。通过这些努力以及更多的努力,药剂师有助于改善患者护理并实现医疗保健效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)的测量标准。因此,通过药剂师对糖尿病管理的贡献来展示改善的健康结果非常重要,这可以为在其他医疗中心和综合医疗系统内的其他医疗实践环境中扩大临床药剂师的作用提供机会。

目的

通过确定达到 HEDIS 糖化血红蛋白(A1c)<8.0%目标的患者百分比、达到这一目标所需的时间以及 2 型糖尿病患者的 A1c 降低情况,来评估初级保健环境中由药剂师管理的项目的效果。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究确定了糖化血红蛋白控制不佳(≥8.0%)的 18-74 岁患者。参与全面护理计划(CCP)的患者的糖尿病治疗由药剂师管理,并与接受常规护理(UC)的患者进行倾向评分匹配。多元回归分析和 Cox 比例风险模型比较了两组患者从基线到 A1c 目标的变化以及达到 A1c 目标的时间。

结果

CCP 和 UC 患者的基线特征无显著差异(每组 980 例患者)。与 UC 患者相比,CCP 患者在 3 个月(OR=2.44,95%CI=1.93-3.10,P<0.0001)和 6 个月(OR=1.32,95%CI=1.08-1.61,P=0.007)时更有可能达到 HEDIS 规定的 A1c<8%的目标。与 UC 患者相比,CCP 患者也更快地达到 A1c 目标:3.4 个月与 4.6 个月(P<0.0001),即使在控制了协变量后(HR=1.24,95%CI=1.09-1.41,P=0.001)。CCP 患者在 3 个月和 6 个月时的基线 A1c 变化分别为-0.95%和-0.54%(P<0.0001),而 UC 患者分别为-1.19%和-0.99%(P=0.008)。

结论

与接受常规护理的患者相比,临床药剂师对 2 型糖尿病治疗的管理与更多患者达到 A1c<8.0%的 HEDIS 目标、更快达到 A1c 目标以及更大的基线 A1c 降低相关。

披露

这项研究没有得到资金支持。作者报告与本文内容无关的潜在利益冲突。所有作者都为研究概念和设计做出了贡献。Benedict 和 Spence 进行了数据分析和解释。Benedict 撰写了手稿,Spence 和 Rashid 提供了协助。所有作者都审阅并为修改手稿做出了贡献。Spence 是这项工作的担保人,因此他可以完全访问研究中的所有数据,并对数据的完整性和数据分析的准确性负责。本研究的部分内容在 AMCP 管理式医疗和专科药房年会;旧金山,加利福尼亚州;2016 年 4 月 19-22 日提出。