University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, Republic of Ireland.
Qual Health Res. 2012 May;22(5):607-18. doi: 10.1177/1049732311431898. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
The role and merits of highly inductive research designs in qualitative health research are well established, and there has been a powerful proliferation of grounded theory method in the field. However, tight qualitative research designs informed by social theory can be useful to sensitize researchers to concepts and processes that they might not necessarily identify through inductive processes. In this article, we provide a reflexive account of our experience of using a theory-driven conceptual framework, the Normalization Process Model, in a qualitative evaluation of general practitioners' uptake of a free, pilot, language interpreting service in the Republic of Ireland. We reflect on our decisions about whether or not to use the Model, and describe our actual use of it to inform research questions, sampling, coding, and data analysis. We conclude with reflections on the added value that the Model and tight design brought to our research.
高度归纳性研究设计在定性健康研究中的作用和优点已得到充分证实,扎根理论方法在该领域也得到了有力的推广。然而,受社会理论启发的严格定性研究设计可以帮助研究人员对他们可能无法通过归纳过程识别的概念和过程保持敏感。在本文中,我们反思了我们在使用理论驱动的概念框架(即正常化过程模型)对爱尔兰共和国全科医生对免费试点语言口译服务的采用情况进行定性评估时的经验。我们反思了是否使用该模型的决定,并描述了我们实际使用该模型来提出研究问题、抽样、编码和数据分析的情况。最后,我们反思了模型和严格设计为我们的研究带来的附加值。