Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Yawkey Building, Suite 9A, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 1;30(4):394-400. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.7996. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
Prior research shows that introducing palliative care soon after diagnosis for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with improvements in quality of life, mood, and survival. We sought to investigate whether early palliative care also affects the frequency and timing of chemotherapy use and hospice care for these patients.
This secondary analysis is based on a randomized controlled trial of 151 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC presenting to an outpatient clinic at a tertiary cancer center from June 2006 to July 2009. Participants received either early palliative care integrated with standard oncology care or standard oncology care alone. By 18-month follow-up, 133 participants (88.1%) had died. Outcome measures included: first, number and types of chemotherapy regimens, and second, frequency and timing of chemotherapy administration and hospice referral.
The overall number of chemotherapy regimens did not differ significantly by study group. However, compared with those in the standard care group, participants receiving early palliative care had half the odds of receiving chemotherapy within 60 days of death (odds ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.99; P = .05), a longer interval between the last dose of intravenous chemotherapy and death (median, 64.00 days [range, 3 to 406 days] v 40.50 days [range, 6 to 287 days]; P = .02), and higher enrollment in hospice care for longer than 1 week (60.0% [36 of 60 patients] v 33.3% [21 of 63 patients]; P = .004).
Although patients with metastatic NSCLC received similar numbers of chemotherapy regimens in the sample, early palliative care optimized the timing of final chemotherapy administration and transition to hospice services, key measures of quality end-of-life care.
先前的研究表明,对诊断为转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的患者在确诊后尽早引入姑息治疗可改善生活质量、情绪和生存率。我们试图调查早期姑息治疗是否也会影响这些患者化疗的使用频率和时机以及临终关怀的使用。
这是一项对 2006 年 6 月至 2009 年 7 月在一家癌症中心的门诊就诊的 151 例新诊断为转移性 NSCLC 的患者进行的随机对照试验的二次分析。参与者接受早期姑息治疗与标准肿瘤学治疗相结合或仅接受标准肿瘤学治疗。在 18 个月的随访中,有 133 名参与者(88.1%)死亡。观察指标包括:第一,化疗方案的数量和类型,第二,化疗的频率和时机以及临终关怀的转诊。
研究组之间的化疗方案总数没有显著差异。然而,与标准护理组相比,接受早期姑息治疗的患者在死亡后 60 天内接受化疗的可能性降低了一半(比值比,0.47;95%CI,0.23 至 0.99;P =.05),静脉化疗的最后一剂与死亡之间的时间间隔更长(中位数,64.00 天[范围,3 至 406 天] v 40.50 天[范围,6 至 287 天];P =.02),并且入组接受超过 1 周的临终关怀的患者比例更高(60.0%[60 例中的 36 例] v 33.3%[63 例中的 21 例];P =.004)。
尽管在样本中转移性 NSCLC 患者接受的化疗方案数量相似,但早期姑息治疗优化了最后一次化疗的给药时机,并促进了向临终关怀服务的过渡,这些是临终关怀质量的关键措施。