Mutch Kelly L, Heidal Kimberly B, Gross Kevin H, Bertrand Brenda
East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(7):540-7. doi: 10.1108/09526861111160571.
The purpose of this research was to assess the preferred route of nutrition support (enteral versus parenteral) for treatment of severe acute pancreatitis in the acute care setting. Further, in cases when enteral nutrition is the preferred route, is nasal-bridling a lower-morbidity and cost-effective method?
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A retrospective review of pre-existing data from an 870-bed hospital system. Medical records were reviewed via an online database system (n = 25 patients) with severe acute pancreatitis. Length of stay and cost were analyzed.
More patients received TPN versus the nasal-jejunal (post-pyloric) tube feeds group. No significant relationship was found between total cost and number of co-morbidities or between either of the two treatment groups. However, a medium to large effect size was shown which could indicate a significant relationship in a larger sample size.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The findings of this research add to the literature already available and will be of interest to those who specialize in this area.
本研究的目的是评估在急性护理环境中治疗重症急性胰腺炎时营养支持的首选途径(肠内与肠外)。此外,在肠内营养是首选途径的情况下,鼻空肠管饲法是否是一种发病率较低且具有成本效益的方法?
设计/方法/途径:对一家拥有870张床位的医院系统的现有数据进行回顾性研究。通过在线数据库系统(n = 25例)对重症急性胰腺炎患者的病历进行回顾。分析住院时间和费用。
与鼻空肠(幽门后)管饲组相比,接受全胃肠外营养(TPN)的患者更多。在总费用与合并症数量之间或两个治疗组中的任何一组之间均未发现显著关系。然而,显示出中等至较大的效应量,这可能表明在更大样本量中存在显著关系。
原创性/价值:本研究的结果补充了现有文献,将对该领域的专业人员有一定意义。