• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

侯赛因·本·阿卜杜拉王子泌尿外科中心的经尿道单极大前列腺切除术经验

Monopolar transurethral resection of the big prostate, experience at Prince Hussein Bin Abdullah Urology Center.

作者信息

Al-Hammouri Firas, Abu-Qamar Adnan

机构信息

Prince Hussein Bin Abdullah Urology Center, King Hussein Medical Center, Amman, Jordan.

出版信息

J Pak Med Assoc. 2011 Jul;61(7):628-31.

PMID:22204233
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and review our experience in management of patients with big size prostate using monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

METHODS

Between January 2005 and March 2010, TURP was performed on 198 patients with prostate size between 80 and 120 grams. The patients were subjected to standard urologic pre-operative evaluation and they were given 5 alpha reductase inhibitor for two weeks before surgery. TURP was performed using 27F continuous-flow resectoscope, Otis urethrotomy and suction cystostomy were done, and 500 ml normal saline with 20mg furosomide was given intraoperatively. Catheterization time, hospital stay, peri-operative and late complications were recorded. All patients were seen at 6 weeks and 6 months post surgery in the outpatient clinic. Symptoms and complications were evaluated and histopathological diagnoses were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean age was 67 +/- 3.7 years (range 57-80 years). Of these, 102 patients presented with retention and obstructive uropathy, 36 with recurrent haematuria, 12 with urinary bladder stones, 11 with recurrent urinary tract infection and 37 patients with moderate to severe international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and not responding to medical treatment. The mean prostate volume was 88 +/- 8.22 grams (range 80-120 grams) with an average residual urine of 160 ml (range 20-1500 ml). The mean Qmax was 6.8 +/- 1.7 ml/sec (range 2.1-11.7 ml/sec) and the mean IPSS score was 20.2 +/- 6.2 (range 15-30). The average operative time was 72 +/- 6.2 minutes (range 58-92 minutes). The mean drop in haemoglobin was 3.2 +/- 0.6 mg/dl (range 2.1-6.1 mg/dl) and immediate post-operative mean sodium drop was 3 +/- 1.36 mmol/l (range 0.9-13 mmol/l). Blood transfusion was needed in 17 patients (8.6%), two patients developed TURP syndrome (1%), and clot retention occurred in two patients (1%). The average time of hospital stay was 2.3 +/- 0.25 days, catheterization time was 48-72 hours, and re-catheterization was needed in three patients (1.5%). The mean IPSS score six weeks after surgery was 9.9 +/- 1.7 (range 6-21) and the mean Qmax was 18.1 +/- 2.1 ml/sec (range 6-22). Urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture occurred in 12 and 3 patients respectively (6 and 1.5%). Completion TURP was needed in four patients (2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Standard monopolar TURP with some modification in resection technique in addition to perioperative care will allow the urologist to treat benign prostate hyperplasia with prostate size between 80-120 grams successfully in centers where new laser technology is not available.

摘要

目的

评估并回顾我们使用单极经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)治疗大体积前列腺患者的经验。

方法

2005年1月至2010年3月期间,对198例前列腺体积在80至120克之间的患者进行了TURP手术。患者接受了标准的泌尿外科术前评估,并在手术前两周给予5α还原酶抑制剂。使用27F连续冲洗式电切镜进行TURP手术,同时进行奥蒂斯尿道切开术和膀胱造瘘术,并在术中给予含20mg呋塞米的500ml生理盐水。记录导尿时间、住院时间、围手术期及远期并发症。所有患者在术后6周和6个月在门诊复诊。评估症状和并发症,并记录组织病理学诊断结果。

结果

患者平均年龄为67±3.7岁(范围57 - 80岁)。其中,102例患者表现为尿潴留和梗阻性尿路病,36例为复发性血尿,12例为膀胱结石,11例为复发性尿路感染,37例患者国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)为中度至重度且药物治疗无效。平均前列腺体积为88±8.22克(范围80 - 120克),平均残余尿量为160ml(范围20 - 1500ml)。平均最大尿流率(Qmax)为6.8±1.7ml/秒(范围2.1 - 11.7ml/秒),平均IPSS评分为20.2±6.2(范围15 - 30)。平均手术时间为72±6.2分钟(范围58 - 92分钟)。血红蛋白平均下降3.2±0.6mg/dl(范围2.1 - 6.1mg/dl),术后即刻血钠平均下降3±1.36mmol/l(范围0.9 - 13mmol/l)。17例患者(8.6%)需要输血,2例患者发生TURP综合征(1%),2例患者出现血块残留(1%)。平均住院时间为2.3±0.25天,导尿时间为48 - 72小时,3例患者(1.5%)需要再次导尿。术后6周平均IPSS评分为9.9±1.7(范围6 - 21),平均Qmax为18.1±2.1ml/秒(范围6 - 22)。分别有12例(6%)和3例(1.5%)患者发生尿道狭窄和膀胱颈挛缩。4例患者(2%)需要行二次TURP手术。

结论

在没有新型激光技术的中心,除围手术期护理外,对切除技术进行一些改进的标准单极TURP可使泌尿外科医生成功治疗前列腺体积在80 - 120克之间的良性前列腺增生患者。

相似文献

1
Monopolar transurethral resection of the big prostate, experience at Prince Hussein Bin Abdullah Urology Center.侯赛因·本·阿卜杜拉王子泌尿外科中心的经尿道单极大前列腺切除术经验
J Pak Med Assoc. 2011 Jul;61(7):628-31.
2
Randomized study of transurethral resection of the prostate and combined transurethral resection and vaporization of the prostate as a therapeutic alternative in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.经尿道前列腺切除术与经尿道前列腺切除术联合汽化术治疗良性前列腺增生症男性患者的随机对照研究。
J Endourol. 2001 Apr;15(3):317-21. doi: 10.1089/089277901750161935.
3
Comparative randomized study on the efficaciousness of endoscopic bipolar prostate resection versus monopolar resection technique. 3 year follow-up.内镜下双极前列腺切除术与单极切除术技术疗效的比较随机研究。3年随访。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2013 Jun 24;85(2):86-91. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2013.2.86.
4
Bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate vs open prostatectomy in large benign prostatic hyperplasia cases - a medium term, prospective, randomized comparison.经尿道双极等离子前列腺剜除术与开放性前列腺切除术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生症的中期前瞻性随机对照研究。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):793-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11730.x. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
5
Usage of GreenLight HPS 180-W laser vaporisation for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.使用绿激光HPS 180-W激光汽化术治疗良性前列腺增生症。
Acta Chir Iugosl. 2014;61(1):57-61.
6
Transurethral vapor resection of prostate is a good alternative for prostates >70 g.经尿道前列腺汽化切除术对于重量超过70克的前列腺是一种不错的选择。
J Endourol. 2007 Dec;21(12):1543-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0285.
7
Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate: is it any better than standard transurethral prostatectomy? 5-year follow-up.经尿道前列腺电汽化术:它比标准经尿道前列腺切除术更好吗?5年随访
J Endourol. 2005 Jan-Feb;19(1):79-82. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.79.
8
Bipolar transurethral vaporization: a superior procedure in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective randomized comparison with bipolar TURP.双极经尿道汽化术:良性前列腺增生的一种更优术式:与双极经尿道前列腺切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究
Int Braz J Urol. 2014 May-Jun;40(3):346-55. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.03.08.
9
Bipolar transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate versus bipolar resection of the prostate for prostates larger than 60gr: A retrospective study at a single academic tertiary care center.双极经尿道前列腺剜除术与前列腺电切术治疗大于60克前列腺的比较:单学术三级医疗中心的回顾性研究
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Jul-Aug;42(4):747-56. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0225.
10
High-intensity diode laser in combination with bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a new strategy for the treatment of large prostates (>80 ml).高强度二极管激光联合双极经尿道前列腺切除术:治疗大体积前列腺(>80毫升)的新策略。
Lasers Surg Med. 2012 Nov;44(9):699-704. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22081. Epub 2012 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-transurethral resection of prostate urethral strictures: Are they often underreported? A single-center retrospective observational cohort study.经尿道前列腺切除术后尿道狭窄:它们是否经常报告不足?一项单中心回顾性观察队列研究。
Urol Ann. 2021 Oct-Dec;13(4):329-335. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_165_19. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
2
Assessment of Complications of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Using Clavien-Dindo Classification in South Eastern Nigeria.在尼日利亚东南部使用Clavien-Dindo分类法评估经尿道前列腺切除术的并发症
Niger J Surg. 2020 Jul-Dec;26(2):142-146. doi: 10.4103/njs.NJS_20_20. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
3
Combined usage of Ho:YAG laser with monopolar resectoscope in the treatment of bladder stone and bladder outlet obstruction.
钬激光联合单极电切镜治疗膀胱结石并膀胱出口梗阻。
Pak J Med Sci. 2014 Jul;30(4):908-13.
4
Management of large prostatic adenoma: Lasers versus bipolar transurethral resection of prostate.大前列腺腺瘤的治疗:激光与双极经尿道前列腺切除术对比
Indian J Urol. 2013 Jul;29(3):225-35. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.117288.