College of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, China.
Ann Bot. 2012 Mar;109(4):813-8. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr314. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
Fine-scale, spatial heterogeneity in soil nutrient availability can increase the growth of individual plants, the productivity of plant communities and interspecific competition. If this is due to the ability of plants to concentrate their roots where nutrient levels are high, then nutrient heterogeneity should have little effect on intraspecific competition, especially when there are no genotypic differences between individuals in root plasticity. We tested this hypothesis in a widespread, clonal species in which individual plants are known to respond to nutrient heterogeneity.
Plants derived from a single clone of Alternanthera philoxeroides were grown in the greenhouse at low or high density (four or 16 plants per 27·5 × 27·5-cm container) with homogeneous or heterogeneous availability of soil nutrients, keeping total nutrient availability per container constant. After 9 weeks, measurements of size, dry mass and morphology were taken.
Plants grew more in the heterogeneous than in the homogeneous treatment, showing that heterogeneity promoted performance; they grew less in the high- than in the low-density treatment, showing that plants competed. There was no interactive effect of nutrient heterogeneity and plant density, supporting the hypothesis that heterogeneity does not affect intraspecific competition in the absence of genotypic differences in plasticity. Treatments did not affect morphological characteristics such as specific leaf area or root/shoot ratio.
Results indicate that fine-scale, spatial heterogeneity in the availability of soil nutrients does not increase competition when plants are genetically identical, consistent with the suggestion that effects of heterogeneity on competition depend upon differences in plasticity between individuals. Heterogeneity is only likely to increase the spread of monoclonal, invasive populations such as that of A. philoxeroides in China.
土壤养分供应的精细尺度、空间异质性会增加个体植物的生长、植物群落的生产力和种间竞争。如果这是由于植物集中根系于养分水平较高的地方的能力所致,那么养分异质性对种内竞争的影响应该很小,特别是当个体之间在根系可塑性方面没有基因型差异时。我们在一种广泛分布的克隆物种中检验了这一假说,该物种中的个体植物已知会对养分异质性做出响应。
在温室中,以低或高密度(每个 27.5×27.5 厘米的容器中种植 4 或 16 株植物)种植来自同一Alternanthera philoxeroides 无性系的植物,同时保持每个容器中土壤养分的均匀或不均匀供应。9 周后,对大小、干质量和形态进行测量。
与均匀处理相比,植物在异质处理中生长得更好,表明异质性促进了生长;与低密度处理相比,植物在高密度处理中生长得更差,表明植物之间存在竞争。养分异质性和植物密度之间没有相互作用的影响,支持了在不存在可塑性基因型差异的情况下,异质性不会影响种内竞争的假说。处理方式不影响形态特征,如比叶面积或根/茎比。
结果表明,在植物具有相同遗传特征的情况下,土壤养分供应的精细尺度、空间异质性不会增加竞争,这与异质性对竞争的影响取决于个体之间可塑性差异的观点一致。只有当存在如中国的 A. philoxeroides 等单克隆、入侵性种群时,异质性才更有可能增加。