Federal University from Paraíba State, Agricultural Sciences Center, Department of Phytotechnical and Environmental Sciences, Ethnoecology Laboratory, Areia City, Paraíba, Brazil.
J Environ Manage. 2012 Apr 15;96(1):106-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
The ecological apparency hypothesis in ethnobotanical studies predicts that the apparent plants (i.e., the most easily found in the vegetation) would be the most commonly collected and used by people. To test this hypothesis, it has been used the concept of use value (VU), which measures the relative importance of useful plants for a group of people. However, the use value has got some limitations, including the fact that it does not distinguish "current use" (plants which are effectively used) from "potential use" (well known plants, however not used). Therefore, this study has tested whether the obtained results through three different use value calculations could be useful in testing the ecological apparency hypothesis. These calculations have included the current use value, the potential use value, and the general use value. It has been carried out a vegetation survey and an interview for residents from the rural communities from Barrocas and Cachoeira (Soledade, Paraíba, Brazil). It has been used Spearman's coefficient to correlate phytosociological and ethnobotanical data. It has been observed that phytosociological parameters in Cachoeira were not correlated with any of the use values calculations, except the relationship between the current use value and the relative dominance (r(s) = 0.57; p < 0.05). In Barrocas, every use value calculation was correlated with the basal area and the relative dominance. When each category of use is analyzed separately, it has been observed that there was no correlation between the use value and the phytosociological parameters, except for the construction category, in which the current use value in Cachoeira was correlated with the relative dominance (r(s) = 0.63; p < 0.05), importance value (r(s) = 0.67; p < 0.01), relative frequency (r(s) = 0.71; p < 0.05), and relative density (r(s) = 0.72; p < 0.01). In Barrocas, the UVc for the construction category was correlated with relative frequency (r(s) = 0.69; p < 0.05) and relative density (r(s) = 0.66; p < 0.01). These results have suggested that, the use value calculation, which takes into consideration just the current use of the species, is the one that best fits in the ecological apparency hypothesis.
在民族植物学研究中,生态表象假说预测最容易在植被中发现的明显植物(即最容易找到的植物)将是人们最常采集和使用的植物。为了检验这一假说,人们使用了使用价值(UV)的概念,该概念衡量了植物对一群人的相对重要性。然而,使用价值存在一些局限性,包括它不能区分“当前使用”(实际使用的植物)和“潜在使用”(广为人知但未使用的植物)。因此,本研究测试了通过三种不同的使用价值计算得出的结果是否有助于检验生态表象假说。这些计算包括当前使用价值、潜在使用价值和一般使用价值。在巴西帕拉伊巴州索莱达的巴罗卡斯和卡舒埃拉的农村社区进行了植被调查和居民访谈。使用斯皮尔曼系数对植物社会学和民族植物学数据进行了相关分析。结果表明,卡舒埃拉的植物社会学参数与任何使用价值计算都没有相关性,除了当前使用价值与相对优势之间的关系(r(s) = 0.57;p < 0.05)。在巴罗卡斯,每个使用价值计算都与基底面积和相对优势相关。当分别分析每个使用类别时,除了建筑类别外,没有观察到使用价值与植物社会学参数之间的相关性,在卡舒埃拉,建筑类别的当前使用价值与相对优势(r(s) = 0.63;p < 0.05)、重要值(r(s) = 0.67;p < 0.01)、相对频率(r(s) = 0.71;p < 0.05)和相对密度(r(s) = 0.72;p < 0.01)相关。在巴罗卡斯,建筑类别的 UVc 与相对频率(r(s) = 0.69;p < 0.05)和相对密度(r(s) = 0.66;p < 0.01)相关。这些结果表明,仅考虑物种当前使用情况的使用价值计算最符合生态表象假说。