Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
J Surg Educ. 2012 Jan-Feb;69(1):13-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
To determine whether the tissue model onto which a knot is tied influences the knot's tensile strength.
Zero-gauge, nonexpired, silk, polyglactin 910, polydioxanone, and polypropylene sutures were tied on 4 different mock tissue models. The tissue models were standard metal hex head screw, uncooked chicken breast, a tube of packaged "string" cheese, and a cylinder of bubble wrap. The knots were tied without a surgeon's knot and with 4 additional square knots (1 = 1 = 1 = 1 = 1). The knots were tied by a single obstetrician/gynecologist investigator (J.M.D.) over the period of 1 week to minimize fatigue. We compared the knots when subjected to a tensiometer until the suture broke or untied. A minimum of 20 knots per group were needed to detect a moderate effect size with a power of 85% and a type I error rate of 5%.
A total of 407 knots were tied with 4 types of material (silk, polyglactin 910, polydioxanone, and polypropylene), using 4 different models (chicken, bubble wrap, cheese, and metal). Among the knot failures, 113 of 407 untied rather than broke (28%). No differences in the likelihood of knots coming untied between the different models (p = 0.34) or tension at failure (p = 0.81) were noted. A 4 × 4 factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine the effects of the suture material and model type on tension at failure and whether there was any interaction between the 2 factors. No significant difference was observed in the interaction between suture material and model type (p = 0.35), and no effect for model type was found (p = 0.22).
Tissue models that use materials more similar to human tissue do not seem to influence knot strength when compared with standard metal models. We propose that it is possible to have an accurate understanding of how knots withstand force and to simulate an in vivo environment by using low-cost, easily accessible natural and synthetic materials for the mechanism onto which the knot is tied.
确定打结组织模型是否会影响结的拉伸强度。
零规、未过期、丝线、聚甘醇酸 910、聚二氧杂环己酮和聚丙烯缝线分别在 4 种不同的模拟组织模型上打结。组织模型为标准金属六角头螺钉、未煮过的鸡胸肉、管状包装的“奶酪”和管状泡沫包装。打结时不使用外科结,而是额外打 4 个方结(1=1=1=1=1)。由一名妇产科医生(J.M.D.)在一周内连续打结,以减少疲劳。我们将这些结用拉力计进行测试,直到缝线断裂或解开。每组至少需要 20 个结,才能检测到中等效应量,置信度为 85%,Ⅰ类错误率为 5%。
共使用 4 种材料(丝线、聚甘醇酸 910、聚二氧杂环己酮和聚丙烯)和 4 种模型(鸡胸肉、泡沫包装、奶酪和金属)共打结 407 个。在结的失效中,407 个结中有 113 个解开而不是断裂(28%)。不同模型之间(p=0.34)或失效时的张力(p=0.81)没有差异。我们进行了 4×4 析因方差分析(ANOVA),以确定缝线材料和模型类型对失效时张力的影响,以及这两个因素之间是否存在任何相互作用。缝线材料和模型类型之间的相互作用没有显著差异(p=0.35),也没有发现模型类型的影响(p=0.22)。
与标准金属模型相比,使用与人组织更相似的材料的组织模型似乎不会影响结的强度。我们提出,通过使用低成本、易于获取的天然和合成材料作为打结的机制,可以准确地了解结如何承受力,并模拟体内环境。