Suppr超能文献

模拟时代的外科培训评估

Evaluation of surgical training in the era of simulation.

作者信息

Shaharan Shazrinizam, Neary Paul

机构信息

Shazrinizam Shaharan, National Surgical Training Centre, Department of Surgical Affairs, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep 16;6(9):436-47. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i9.436.

Abstract

AIM

To assess where we currently stand in relation to simulator-based training within modern surgical training curricula.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed database using keywords "simulation", "skills assessment" and "surgery". The studies retrieved were examined according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Time period reviewed was 2000 to 2013. The methodology of skills assessment was examined.

RESULTS

Five hundred and fifteen articles focussed upon simulator based skills assessment. Fifty-two articles were identified that dealt with technical skills assessment in general surgery. Five articles assessed open skills, 37 assessed laparoscopic skills, 4 articles assessed both open and laparoscopic skills and 6 assessed endoscopic skills. Only 12 articles were found to be integrating simulators in the surgical training curricula. Observational assessment tools, in the form of Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) dominated the literature.

CONCLUSION

Observational tools such as OSATS remain the top assessment instrument in surgical training especially in open technical skills. Unlike the aviation industry, simulation based assessment has only now begun to cross the threshold of incorporation into mainstream skills training. Over the next decade we expect the promise of simulator-based training to finally take flight and begin an exciting voyage of discovery for surgical trainees.

摘要

目的

评估在现代外科培训课程中,基于模拟器的培训目前处于何种水平。

方法

在PubMed数据库中使用关键词“模拟”“技能评估”和“外科手术”进行系统的文献检索。根据纳入和排除标准对检索到的研究进行审查。回顾的时间段为2000年至2013年。对技能评估的方法进行了审查。

结果

515篇文章聚焦于基于模拟器的技能评估。确定了52篇涉及普通外科技术技能评估的文章。5篇评估开放技能,37篇评估腹腔镜技能,4篇同时评估开放和腹腔镜技能,6篇评估内镜技能。仅发现12篇文章将模拟器整合到外科培训课程中。以客观结构化技术技能评估(OSATS)形式的观察性评估工具在文献中占主导地位。

结论

诸如OSATS之类的观察性工具仍然是外科培训中首要的评估手段,尤其是在开放技术技能方面。与航空业不同,基于模拟的评估直到现在才开始跨越纳入主流技能培训的门槛。在未来十年,我们预计基于模拟器的培训有望最终腾飞,并开启外科实习生激动人心的探索之旅。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of surgical training in the era of simulation.模拟时代的外科培训评估
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep 16;6(9):436-47. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i9.436.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Assessment of surgical trainees' quality of knot-tying.评估外科实习医生的打结质量。
J Surg Educ. 2013 Jan-Feb;70(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
9
Evaluation of a novel laparoscopic simulation laboratory curriculum.新型腹腔镜模拟实验室课程评估。
Surgery. 2012 Oct;152(4):550-4; discussion 554-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.08.009.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验