Cherfan Antoine J, Tamim Hani M, AlJumah Abdulrahman, Rishu Asgar H, Al-Abdulkareem Abdulmajeed, Al Knawy Bandar A, Hajeer Ali, Tamimi Waleed, Brits Riette, Arabi Yaseen M
Pharmaceutical Care Department, Clinical Pharmacy Division, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Dec 30;11:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6904-11-22.
Clinical effects and outcomes of a single dose etomidate prior to intubation in the intensive care setting is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association of a single dose effect of etomidate prior to intubation on the mortality of septic cirrhotic patients and the impact of the subsequent use of low dose hydrocortisone.
This is a nested-cohort study within a randomized double blind placebo controlled study evaluating the use of low dose hydrocortisone in cirrhotic septic patients. Cirrhotic septic patients ≥ 18 years were included in the study. Patients who received etomidate prior to intubation were compared to those who did not receive etomidate for all cause 28-day mortality as a primary outcome.
Sixty two intubated patients out of the 75 patients randomized in the initial trial were eligible for this study. Twenty three of the 62 intubated patients received etomidate dose prior to intubation. Etomidate use was not associated with all cause 28-day mortality or hospital mortality but was associated with significantly higher ICU mortality (91% vs. 64% for etomidate and controls groups, respectively; p = 0.02). Etomidate patients who received subsequent doses of hydrocortisone required lower doses of vasopressors and had more vasopressor-free days but no improvement in mortality.
In this group of septic cirrhotic patients with very high mortality, etomidate increased ICU mortality. Subsequent use of hydrocortisone appears to have no benefit beyond decreasing vasopressor requirements. The lowest mortality was observed in patients who did not receive etomidate but received hydrocortisone.
在重症监护环境中,插管前单次使用依托咪酯的临床效果和结局存在争议。本研究的目的是评估插管前依托咪酯单次给药对感染性肝硬化患者死亡率的影响,以及后续使用低剂量氢化可的松的作用。
这是一项嵌套队列研究,嵌套于一项评估低剂量氢化可的松在肝硬化脓毒症患者中应用的随机双盲安慰剂对照研究。纳入年龄≥18岁的肝硬化脓毒症患者。将插管前接受依托咪酯的患者与未接受依托咪酯的患者进行比较,以全因28天死亡率作为主要结局。
初始试验中随机分组的75例患者中有62例插管患者符合本研究条件。62例插管患者中有23例在插管前接受了依托咪酯治疗。使用依托咪酯与全因28天死亡率或医院死亡率无关,但与ICU死亡率显著升高相关(依托咪酯组和对照组分别为91%和64%;p = 0.02)。接受后续氢化可的松剂量的依托咪酯患者需要较低剂量的血管升压药,且无血管升压药的天数更多,但死亡率无改善。
在这组死亡率极高的感染性肝硬化患者中,依托咪酯增加了ICU死亡率。后续使用氢化可的松除了降低血管升压药需求外似乎没有益处。未接受依托咪酯但接受氢化可的松的患者死亡率最低。