• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医师学习创伤超声重点评估的技术错误。

The technical errors of physicians learning to perform focused assessment with sonography in trauma.

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;19(1):98-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01242.x. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01242.x
PMID:22211463
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to assess the incidence of various technical errors committed by emergency physicians (EPs) learning to perform focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST).

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of the first 75 consecutive FAST exams for each EP from April 2000 to June 2005. Exams were assessed for noninterpretable views, misinterpretation of images, poor gain, suboptimal depth, an incomplete exam, or backward image orientation.

RESULTS

A total of 2,223 FAST exams done by 85 EPs were reviewed. Multiple noninterpretable views or misinterpreted images occurred in 24% of exams for those performing their first 10 exams, 3.6% for those performing their 41st to 50th exams, and 0% for those performing their 71st to 75th exams (Cochran-Armitage trend test = 10.5, p < 0.0001). A single noninterpretable view, poor gain, suboptimal depth, incomplete exam, or backward image orientation occurred in 48% of exams for those performing their first 10 exams, 17% for those performing their 41st to 50th exams, and 5% for those performing their 71st to 75th exams (Cochran-Armitage trend test = 11.6, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of specific technical errors of EPs learning to perform FAST at our institution improved with hands-on experience. Interpretive skills improved more rapidly than image acquisition skills.

摘要

目的

评估急诊医师(EP)在学习进行创伤重点超声评估(FAST)时出现的各种技术错误的发生率。

方法

这是对 2000 年 4 月至 2005 年 6 月期间每位 EP 进行的前 75 次连续 FAST 检查的回顾性分析。检查评估了不可读视图、图像误读、增益不佳、深度不佳、检查不完整或图像反向等情况。

结果

共回顾了 2223 次由 85 名 EP 进行的 FAST 检查。对于前 10 次检查的 EP,24%的检查存在多个不可读视图或图像误读,第 41 至 50 次检查的 EP 为 3.6%,第 71 至 75 次检查的 EP 为 0%(Cochran-Armitage 趋势检验=10.5,p<0.0001)。对于前 10 次检查的 EP,48%的检查存在单个不可读视图、增益不佳、深度不佳、检查不完整或图像反向,第 41 至 50 次检查的 EP 为 17%,第 71 至 75 次检查的 EP 为 5%(Cochran-Armitage 趋势检验=11.6,p<0.0001)。

结论

在我们的机构中,EP 学习进行 FAST 时出现的特定技术错误的发生率随着实践经验的增加而降低。解读技能的提高速度快于图像采集技能。

相似文献

1
The technical errors of physicians learning to perform focused assessment with sonography in trauma.医师学习创伤超声重点评估的技术错误。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;19(1):98-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01242.x. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
2
Prospective analysis of the effect of physician experience with the FAST examination in reducing the use of CT scans.
Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Feb;17(1):24-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00681.x.
3
Caudal Edge of the Liver in the Right Upper Quadrant (RUQ) View Is the Most Sensitive Area for Free Fluid on the FAST Exam.右上腹(RUQ)视图中肝脏的尾缘是快速超声检查(FAST)中检测游离液体最敏感的区域。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;18(2):270-280. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.11.30435. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
4
Anechoic stripe size influences accuracy of FAST examination interpretation.无回声条带大小会影响快速超声检查(FAST)解读的准确性。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Mar;13(3):248-53. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.09.012. Epub 2006 Feb 22.
5
Comparison of a multimedia simulator to a human model for teaching FAST exam image interpretation and image acquisition.比较多媒体模拟器与人模型在教授 FAST 检查图像解读和图像获取方面的效果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Apr;18(4):413-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01037.x.
6
Medical education for emergency physician focused on basic competence (Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma). Evaluation of the Romanian national program: "Regional Emergency Medical Services Systems".针对急诊医生的医学教育侧重于基本能力(创伤超声重点评估)。罗马尼亚国家项目“区域紧急医疗服务系统”的评估。
Med Ultrason. 2011 Dec;13(4):283-91.
7
The learning curve of resident physicians using emergency ultrasonography for obstructive uropathy.住院医师使用急诊超声诊断尿路梗阻的学习曲线。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;17(9):1024-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00850.x.
8
Occult pneumothorax in trauma patients: should this be sought in the focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination?创伤患者的隐匿性气胸:在创伤超声重点评估检查中是否应寻找这种情况?
Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Oct-Dec;17(5-6):488-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00781.x.
9
Ultrafest: a novel approach to ultrasound in medical education leads to improvement in written and clinical examinations.超级超声培训法:医学教育中一种新颖的超声教学方法可提高笔试和临床考试成绩。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;16(1):143-8. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.11.23746. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
10
FAST and Furious About Quality: Impact of Continuous Review and Feedback on Point-of-Care Ultrasound Examinations.快速而热烈地关注质量:连续审查和反馈对即时超声检查的影响。
Am Surg. 2024 Nov;90(11):2857-2861. doi: 10.1177/00031348241257465. Epub 2024 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma in the Emergency Department: A Comprehensive Review.急诊科创伤超声扩展聚焦评估:全面综述
J Clin Med. 2025 May 15;14(10):3457. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103457.
2
Role of 2-day critical ultrasound training curriculum in guiding clinical activities in China.为期两天的重症超声培训课程在中国指导临床活动中的作用。
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Jan 15;16(1):323-332. doi: 10.62347/TIZE9733. eCollection 2024.
3
Evaluation of Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma Completeness of Children in the Clinical Setting.
临床环境中创伤儿童超声重点评估的完整性评估。
J Ultrasound Med. 2024 May;43(5):873-879. doi: 10.1002/jum.16417. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
4
Exploring the use of knobology for image optimisation in final year sonography students.探索旋钮技术在超声专业本科最后一年学生图像优化中的应用。
Ultrasound. 2022 Nov;30(4):299-306. doi: 10.1177/1742271X211053029. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
5
Development of a Consensus-Based Definition of Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma in Children.基于共识的儿童创伤超声重点评估定义的制定。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222922. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2922.
6
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Strategy for Automated View Classification of Pediatric Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma.基于深度学习的儿童创伤超声重点评估声像图自动分类策略的构建与验证
J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Aug;41(8):1915-1924. doi: 10.1002/jum.15868. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
7
Deep Learning Assisted Detection of Abdominal Free Fluid in Morison's Pouch During Focused Assessment With Sonography in Trauma.深度学习辅助在创伤超声重点评估中检测莫里森陷凹内的腹腔游离液体。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 23;8:707437. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.707437. eCollection 2021.
8
Extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma.创伤超声重点评估扩展方案
BJA Educ. 2018 Feb;18(2):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
9
Frequency-Dependent Spatial Coherence in Conventional and Chirp Transmissions.常规和啁啾传输中的频率相关空间相干性。
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2021 May;68(5):1707-1720. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3050120. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
10
Efficacy of a certified modular ultrasound curriculum.认证模块式超声课程的效果。
Anaesthesist. 2020 Mar;69(3):192-197. doi: 10.1007/s00101-020-00730-9. Epub 2020 Feb 13.