Claggett Shalyn
Stud Engl Lit. 2011;51(4):849-64. doi: 10.1353/sel.2011.0036.
This essay tracks George Eliot's sustained interest in the epistemological problems surrounding the Victorian tendency to envision the future through the body's materiality. It argues that her nuanced criticism of phrenology in "The Lifted Veil" (1859) and "A Minor Prophet" (1865) addresses the delimiting psychological and social effects that attend an applied theory of physiological determinism. Returning to this problem in Daniel Deronda (1876), Eliot offers Mordecai's plan to posit Deronda's body as a living emblem as a radical alternative to racial iconography and typological meaning—a move that allowed her to reconcile the body's legibility with a future beyond socially inscribed possibilities.
本文追溯了乔治·艾略特对围绕维多利亚时代通过身体物质性来构想未来的倾向所产生的认识论问题的持续关注。文章认为,她在《揭开的面纱》(1859年)和《一个小先知》(1865年)中对颅相学的细致入微的批评,探讨了应用生理决定论理论所带来的局限性心理和社会影响。在《丹尼尔·德龙达》(1876年)中回到这个问题时,艾略特提出莫迪凯的计划,即将德龙达的身体设定为一个活的象征,作为种族肖像学和类型学意义的激进替代方案——这一举动使她能够将身体的可读性与超越社会既定可能性的未来相协调。