Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1906, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jan 1;18(1):51-63. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0999.
Although they have been advocated with an understandable enthusiasm, mitosis-specific agents such as inhibitors of mitotic kinases and kinesin spindle protein have not been successful clinically. These drugs were developed as agents that would build on the success of microtubule-targeting agents while avoiding the neurotoxicity that encumbers drugs such as taxanes and vinca alkaloids. The rationale for using mitosis-specific agents was based on the thesis that the clinical efficacy of microtubule-targeting agents could be ascribed to the induction of mitotic arrest. However, the latter concept, which has long been accepted as dogma, is likely important only in cell culture and rapidly growing preclinical models, and irrelevant in patient tumors, where interference with intracellular trafficking on microtubules is likely the principal mechanism of action. Here we review the preclinical and clinical data for a diverse group of inhibitors that target mitosis and identify the reasons why these highly specific, myelosuppressive compounds have failed to deliver on their promise.
虽然有理由带着可以理解的热情来倡导使用有丝分裂特异性药物,如有丝分裂激酶抑制剂和驱动蛋白纺锤体蛋白抑制剂,但这些药物在临床上并未取得成功。这些药物被开发为在利用微管靶向药物成功的基础上,同时避免-taxanes 和长春花生物碱等药物的神经毒性的药物。使用有丝分裂特异性药物的基本原理是基于这样的假设,即微管靶向药物的临床疗效可以归因于诱导有丝分裂阻滞。然而,长期以来被认为是教条的后一种概念,可能仅在细胞培养和快速生长的临床前模型中很重要,而与患者肿瘤无关,在患者肿瘤中,干扰微管上的细胞内运输可能是主要的作用机制。在这里,我们回顾了针对有丝分裂的各种抑制剂的临床前和临床数据,并确定了为什么这些高度特异性、骨髓抑制性化合物未能兑现其承诺的原因。