Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Anesthesiology. 2012 Feb;116(2):296-310. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318242349a.
Two preconditioning stimuli should induce a more consistent overall cell protection. We hypothesized that remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC, second preconditioning stimulus) applied during isoflurane inhalation (first preconditioning stimulus) would provide more protection to the myocardium of patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
In this placebo-controlled randomized controlled study, patients in the RIPC group received four 5-min cycles of 300 mmHg cuff inflation/deflation of the leg before aortic cross-clamping. Anesthesia consisted of opioids and propofol for induction and isoflurane for maintenance. The primary outcome was high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T release. Secondary endpoints were plasma levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, S100 protein, and short- and long-term clinical outcomes. Gene expression profiles were obtained from atrial tissue using microarrays.
RIPC (n = 27) did not reduce high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T release when compared with placebo (n = 28). Likewise, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, a marker of myocardial dysfunction; high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, a marker of perioperative inflammatory response; and S100, a marker of cerebral injury, were not different between the groups. The incidence for the perioperative composite endpoint combining new arrhythmias and myocardial infarctions was higher in the RIPC group than the placebo group (14/27 vs. 6/28, P = 0.036). However, there was no difference in the 6-month cardiovascular outcome. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide release correlated with isoflurane-induced transcriptional changes in fatty-acid metabolism (P = 0.001) and DNA-damage signaling (P < 0.001), but not with RIPC-induced changes in gene expression.
RIPC applied during isoflurane inhalation provides no benefit to the myocardium of patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
两种预处理刺激应诱导更一致的整体细胞保护。我们假设,在吸入异氟醚(第一预处理刺激)期间应用远程缺血预处理(RIPC,第二预处理刺激)将为接受体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者的心肌提供更多保护。
在这项安慰剂对照随机对照研究中,RIPC 组的患者在主动脉夹闭前接受了四个 5 分钟的腿部 300mmHg 袖带充气/放气循环。麻醉包括阿片类药物和异丙酚诱导,异氟醚维持。主要结局是高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 T 释放。次要终点是 N 端脑利钠肽前体、高敏 C 反应蛋白、S100 蛋白的血浆水平以及短期和长期临床结局。使用微阵列从心房组织中获得基因表达谱。
与安慰剂组(n=28)相比,RIPC(n=27)并未减少高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 T 的释放。同样,N 端脑利钠肽前体(心肌功能障碍的标志物);高敏 C 反应蛋白(围手术期炎症反应的标志物);和 S100(脑损伤的标志物)在两组之间无差异。与安慰剂组相比,RIPC 组围手术期复合终点(包括新发心律失常和心肌梗死)的发生率更高(14/27 比 6/28,P=0.036)。然而,6 个月心血管结局无差异。N 端脑利钠肽前体的释放与异氟醚诱导的脂肪酸代谢(P=0.001)和 DNA 损伤信号(P<0.001)的转录变化相关,但与 RIPC 诱导的基因表达变化无关。
在吸入异氟醚期间应用 RIPC 不能为接受体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者的心肌提供益处。