• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用岛状软骨或颞肌筋膜的鼓室成形术:一项对比研究。

Tympanoplasty with island cartilage or temporalis fascia: a comparative study.

作者信息

Bozdemir Kazım, Kutluhan Ahmet, Yalçıner Gökhan, Tarlak Behçet, Bilgen Akif Sinan

机构信息

ENT Department, Ankara Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2012;74(1):28-32. doi: 10.1159/000335056. Epub 2012 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1159/000335056
PMID:22222865
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare clinical and audiological outcomes of the type 1 tympanoplasties where conchal cartilage (island graft) and temporalis fascia were used as the graft material.

PROCEDURES

In this retrospective study, the results of type 1 tympanoplasty operations (n = 50) in which cartilage and temporalis fascia were used for graft material were compared.

RESULTS

Pre- and postoperative otoscopic findings of both groups were similar (p > 0.05). Preoperatively, the pure tone averages (PTAs) and hearing thresholds of the fascia and cartilage groups were similar (p > 0.05). However, postoperatively, the PTAs and air-bone gap closure were better with temporalis fascia compared to cartilage grafting (p < 0.05). On frequency-specific comparisons, the pure tone thresholds at the frequencies of 0.5, 1 and 2 kHz recovered better with temporalis fascia compared to cartilage (p < 0.05). Although the pure tone recovery was better at 4 kHz with temporalis fascia, the difference between the groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION AND MESSAGE

In conclusion, in contrast to many reports in the literature, temporalis fascia grafting seems better in our study than grafting with conchal cartilage.

摘要

目的

比较使用耳甲软骨(岛状移植物)和颞肌筋膜作为移植材料的Ⅰ型鼓室成形术的临床和听力学结果。

程序

在这项回顾性研究中,比较了使用软骨和颞肌筋膜作为移植材料的Ⅰ型鼓室成形术(n = 50)的结果。

结果

两组术前和术后的耳镜检查结果相似(p > 0.05)。术前,筋膜组和软骨组的纯音平均听阈(PTA)和听力阈值相似(p > 0.05)。然而,术后,与软骨移植相比,颞肌筋膜组的PTA和气骨导差闭合情况更好(p < 0.05)。在特定频率比较中,与软骨相比,颞肌筋膜在0.5、1和2 kHz频率处的纯音阈值恢复更好(p < 0.05)。尽管颞肌筋膜在4 kHz处的纯音恢复更好,但两组之间的差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。

结论与启示

总之,与文献中的许多报道相反,在我们的研究中,颞肌筋膜移植似乎比耳甲软骨移植效果更好。

相似文献

1
Tympanoplasty with island cartilage or temporalis fascia: a comparative study.采用岛状软骨或颞肌筋膜的鼓室成形术:一项对比研究。
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2012;74(1):28-32. doi: 10.1159/000335056. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
2
Perichondrium/Cartilage island flap and temporalis muscle fascia in type I tympanoplasty.鼓室成形术Ⅰ型中应用软骨膜/软骨岛瓣及颞肌筋膜
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Aug;40(4):295-9.
3
Effect of type I tympanoplasty on the resonant frequency of the middle ear: comparison between chondrotympanoplasty and temporalis fascia grafting.鼓室成形术Ⅰ型对中耳共振频率的影响:软骨鼓膜成形术与颞筋膜瓣移植的比较。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Feb;41(1):14-9.
4
Clinical advantages of cartilage palisades over temporalis fascia in type I tympanoplasty.在Ⅰ型鼓室成形术中,软骨栅柱相对于颞肌筋膜的临床优势。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014 Oct;41(5):422-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
5
Functional results of temporalis fascia versus cartilage tympanoplasty in patients with bilateral chronic otitis media.颞肌筋膜与软骨鼓膜成形术治疗双侧慢性中耳炎患者的功能结果
J Laryngol Otol. 2012 Jan;126(1):22-5. doi: 10.1017/S0022215111002817. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
6
A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty in children: anatomic and functional results.儿童1型鼓室成形术中软骨柱与筋膜的比较:解剖学和功能结果
Otol Neurotol. 2008 Aug;29(5):679-83. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31817dad57.
7
Comparison of cartilage with temporalis fascia tympanoplasty: A meta-analysis of comparative studies.软骨与颞肌筋膜鼓室成形术的比较:比较研究的荟萃分析。
Laryngoscope. 2017 Sep;127(9):2139-2148. doi: 10.1002/lary.26451. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
8
Audiological Outcomes of Type 1 Tympanoplasty Using Conchal Cartilage and Temporalis Fascia.使用耳甲软骨和颞肌筋膜的Ⅰ型鼓室成形术的听力学结果
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2023 Dec;33(12):1445-1448. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2023.12.1445.
9
Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty.比较 I 型鼓室成形术中不同鼓膜重建技术的效果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Mar;268(3):471-4. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1473-y. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
10
Does cartilage tympanoplasty impair hearing in patients with normal preoperative hearing? A comparison of different techniques.软骨鼓膜成形术会损害术前听力正常患者的听力吗?不同技术的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar;276(3):673-677. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5262-3. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Preliminary results of a new endoscopic underlay cartilage tympanoplasty with lateral malleolar flap.一种采用外侧踝瓣的新型内镜下衬里软骨鼓膜成形术的初步结果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09337-5.
2
Comparison of temporalis muscle fascia and cartilage grafts for primary type 1 tympanoplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较原发性 1 型鼓室成形术中颞肌筋膜和软骨移植物的效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Dec;280(12):5153-5165. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08170-y. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
3
A Comparative Study of Temporalis Fascia Graft and Full Thickness Tragal Island Cartilage Graft in Type 1 Tympanoplasty.
颞肌筋膜移植与全层耳屏岛状软骨移植在Ⅰ型鼓室成形术中的比较研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug;74(Suppl 1):619-623. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02459-2. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
4
Shifting from postauricular to transcanal microscopic tympanoplasty may have similar frequency-specific improvements with better air-bone-gap closure at low frequencies and a minimal learning-curve effect.由耳后入路改为经耳道显微镜下鼓室成形术可能具有相似的频率特异性改善,低频骨气导差闭合更好,且学习曲线效应最小。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 8;16(7):e0253947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253947. eCollection 2021.
5
A Three Point Assessment Protocol for Tympanoplasty Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis.鼓膜成形术结果的三点评估方案:一项回顾性分析
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct;24(4):e438-e443. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402432. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
6
Preparation and placement of cartilage island graft in tympanoplasty.鼓室成形术中的软骨岛移植物的制备和放置。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Nov-Dec;80(6):522-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Aug 28.