Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Apr;21(4):420-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.2339. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
Clinical practice guidelines for appropriate nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) utilisation focus on preventing NSAID-related gastrointestinal (GI), cardiovascular (CV), congestive heart failure (CHF) and renal adverse events. We compared concordance of NSAID prescriptions with clinical practice guideline recommendations in Quebec, pre and post rofecoxib withdrawal from market.
Data were obtained from the Quebec Health Insurance Agency (RAMQ). All prescriptions for celecoxib and traditional NSAIDs (tNSAIDs) dispensed to patients ≥50 years of age were evaluated for concordance with clinical practice guidelines. Prescriptions were stratified by time period (pre and post rofecoxib withdrawal) and, GI, CV, CHF and renal risk factors at the dispensing date. Gastro-protective agent (GPA) co-prescriptions were also evaluated.
We assessed 1,966,793 celecoxib and 1,743,481 tNSAIDs prescriptions. Of celecoxib prescriptions, 87.2% and 86.5% were appropriate in the post- and pre-periods, respectively, compared to 72.6% and 70.1% of tNSAIDs prescriptions, respectively. In logistic regression, 'appropriateness' of celecoxib prescriptions increased with age, rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis (OA), and was higher in the post- versus pre-period (odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.26); it was lower in women and in patients with higher income. 'Appropriateness' of tNSAID prescriptions decreased in the post-period (0.92, 0.89-0.95), was lower in older persons and those with OA, and higher in women and in higher income patients. Of tNSAID prescriptions that should have received a GPA co-prescription, only 45.6% did.
Concordance with guideline recommendations increased for celecoxib and decreased for tNSAIDs after rofecoxib withdrawal; GPA co-prescription with tNSAIDs remained suboptimal.
适当使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)的临床实践指南侧重于预防 NSAID 相关的胃肠道(GI)、心血管(CV)、充血性心力衰竭(CHF)和肾脏不良事件。我们比较了魁北克在罗非昔布撤出市场前后,NSAID 处方与临床实践指南建议的一致性。
数据来自魁北克健康保险局(RAMQ)。对所有≥50 岁患者开出的塞来昔布和传统 NSAIDs(tNSAIDs)处方进行评估,以确定其与临床实践指南的一致性。处方按时间(罗非昔布撤出前后)和配药日期的 GI、CV、CHF 和肾脏危险因素进行分层。还评估了胃保护剂(GPA)的联合处方。
我们评估了 1966793 例塞来昔布和 1743481 例 tNSAIDs 处方。在撤出前后,塞来昔布处方的“适当性”分别为 87.2%和 86.5%,而 tNSAIDs 处方的“适当性”分别为 72.6%和 70.1%。在逻辑回归中,塞来昔布处方的“适当性”随年龄、类风湿关节炎和骨关节炎(OA)而增加,并且在后期高于前期(比值比 1.22,95%置信区间 1.18-1.26);女性和收入较高的患者较低。tNSAID 处方的“适当性”在后期降低(0.92,0.89-0.95),年龄较大者和 OA 患者较低,女性和收入较高者较高。在应该使用 GPA 联合处方的 tNSAID 处方中,只有 45.6% 实际使用了该处方。
罗非昔布撤出后,塞来昔布与指南建议的一致性增加,而 tNSAID 则降低;tNSAID 与 GPA 的联合处方仍然不理想。