Environmental Ergonomics Research Centre, Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, United Kingdom.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Dec;130(6):3723-8. doi: 10.1121/1.3654014.
Real-world whole-body vibration exposures comprise motion in fore-aft, lateral, and vertical directions simultaneously. There can also be components of roll, pitch, and yaw. If evaluating vibration with respect to human response, most investigators will use methods defined in ISO 2631-1. This uses frequency weightings that were originally derived from laboratory studies of the subjective responses to vibration in one direction at a time. This paper describes experiments that were carried out using a 6 degree-of-freedom vibration simulator to validate the applicability of ISO 2631-1 in multi-axis environments. Fifteen subjects were exposed to 87 stimuli comprising single-axis, dual-axis, and tri-axial random vibration, to which they were required to produce subjective ratings. It is shown that in this study the root-sum-of-squares method of summation of subjective ratings in individual axes was an adequate technique for prediction of subjective rating of multi-axis vibration. Better agreement between objective and subjective measures of vibration was obtained for unweighted vibration than for frequency weighted signals. The best agreement for this study was achieved when axis multiplying factors were set at 2.2 and 2.4 for x- and y-axis vibration, respectively. Different values could be appropriate for other postures, seats, and vibration conditions and should be determined in future studies.
真实世界中的全身振动暴露包含了前后、左右和垂直方向的运动,同时可能还有滚动、俯仰和偏航的分量。如果要评估人体对振动的反应,大多数研究人员将使用 ISO 2631-1 中定义的方法。该方法使用的频率加权最初是从一次在一个方向上对振动的主观反应的实验室研究中得出的。本文描述了使用 6 自由度振动模拟器进行的实验,以验证 ISO 2631-1 在多轴环境中的适用性。15 名受试者暴露于 87 个刺激物,包括单轴、双轴和三轴随机振动,要求他们对这些刺激物进行主观评价。结果表明,在本研究中,各轴主观评价的均方根和方法是预测多轴振动主观评价的一种合适技术。与未加权振动相比,频率加权信号的振动客观和主观测量之间的一致性更好。对于这项研究,当 x 轴和 y 轴振动的轴乘因子分别设置为 2.2 和 2.4 时,可获得最佳的一致性。对于其他姿势、座椅和振动条件,可能需要使用不同的值,应在未来的研究中确定。