Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
BMC Vet Res. 2012 Jan 6;8:2. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-2.
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae is the primary cause of enzootic pneumonia in pigs. Although vaccination is an important control tool, the results observed under field conditions are variable. This may be due to antigenic differences between the strains circulating in pig herds and the vaccine strain. This study compared the protective efficacy of four bacterins against challenge infection with a highly virulent field strain of M. hyopneumoniae. Seventy eight, one-week old piglets were randomly assigned to five treatment groups (A, B, C, D, E), 14 piglets each, and a negative control group (F) consisting of 8 piglets. All pigs were injected at 1 (D7) and 4 weeks of age (D28), with 2 ml of either a placebo or a bacterin based on selected M. hyopneumoniae strains, namely A (F7.2C), B (F20.1L), C (B2V1W20 1A-F), D (J strain), E (placebo; positive control), F (placebo; negative control). At D56, all pigs except those of group F were challenged intratracheally with 7 ml culture medium containing 107 CCU/ml of M. hyopneumoniae strain F7.2C. All pigs were euthanized and necropsied at D84. The severity of coughing and pneumonia lesions were the main parameters. Immunofluorescence (IF) testing, nested PCR testing of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and serology for M. hyopneumoniae were also performed.
The different bacterins only slightly improved clinical symptoms (average 0.38 in vaccinated groups vs. 0.45 in group E) and histopathological lung lesions (average 3.20 in vaccinated groups vs. 3.45 in group E), but did not improve macroscopic lung lesions (score 4.30 vs. 4.03 in group E). None of the vaccines was significantly and/or consistently better or worse than the other ones. All bacterins evoked a serological response in the vaccinated animals. All pigs, except those from group F, were positive with nPCR in BAL fluid at D84.
The bacterins did not induce a clear overall protection against challenge infection, and there were no significant differences in protective efficacy between bacterins containing homologous and heterologous M. hyopneumoniae strains. Further research is necessary to better characterize the antigens involved in protection and to elucidate the protective immunity responses following M. hyopneumoniae vaccination and/or infection.
猪肺炎支原体是猪地方性肺炎的主要病原体。尽管疫苗接种是一种重要的控制工具,但在田间条件下观察到的结果是可变的。这可能是由于猪群中流行株与疫苗株之间的抗原差异所致。本研究比较了四种菌苗对高毒力野毒株感染的保护效力。78 头 1 周龄仔猪随机分为五组(A、B、C、D、E),每组 14 头,阴性对照组(F)8 头。所有仔猪分别于 1 周龄(D7)和 4 周龄(D28)注射 2ml 安慰剂或基于选定的猪肺炎支原体株的菌苗,即 A(F7.2C)、B(F20.1L)、C(B2V1W20 1A-F)、D(J 株)、E(安慰剂;阳性对照)、F(安慰剂;阴性对照)。在 D56 时,除 F 组外,所有仔猪均经气管内滴注含有 107 CCU/ml 猪肺炎支原体 F7.2C 株的 7ml 培养液进行攻毒。所有仔猪均于 D84 时安乐死并剖检。咳嗽严重程度和肺炎病变严重程度是主要参数。还进行了免疫荧光(IF)检测、支气管肺泡灌洗液(BAL)的巢式 PCR 检测和猪肺炎支原体血清学检测。
不同的菌苗仅轻微改善了临床症状(接种组平均为 0.38,E 组为 0.45)和组织病理学肺部病变(接种组平均为 3.20,E 组为 3.45),但未改善大体肺部病变(E 组为 4.30,E 组为 4.03)。没有一种疫苗明显优于或劣于其他疫苗。所有菌苗均在接种动物中引起血清学反应。除 F 组外,所有仔猪在 D84 时 BAL 液的 nPCR 均为阳性。
菌苗不能对攻毒感染产生明显的整体保护作用,并且同源和异源猪肺炎支原体菌株的菌苗在保护效力方面没有显著差异。需要进一步研究以更好地描述保护相关抗原,并阐明猪肺炎支原体接种和/或感染后的保护免疫反应。