• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在急诊医学研究中控制损伤的严重程度。

Controlling for the severity of injuries in emergency medicine research.

作者信息

Murphy J G, Cayten C G, Stahl W M

机构信息

Institute for Trauma and Emergency Care, New York Medical College, Valhalla.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 1990 Nov;8(6):484-91. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(90)90147-r.

DOI:10.1016/0735-6757(90)90147-r
PMID:2222589
Abstract

The injury severity score (ISS) and age have been used retrospectively to control for trauma severity. Other control variables such as the revised trauma score (RTS) and the TRISS method (which estimates the probability of survival for each patient) additionally require that values of blood pressure, Glasgow coma scale, and respiratory rate, be recorded in the emergency department. The authors question when the RTS, ISS, the ISS and age, or the probability of survival calculated using the TRISS method should be used to control for severity of injuries in trauma research. Relations between predictor variables and (1) survival to hospital discharge, (2) hospital length of stay for survivors, and (3) length of ICU stay were compared by cause of injury: penetrating, motor vehicle accident, low fall, or other blunt. Data were collected over 12 months for 2,914 consecutive adult patients who died or stayed in five nontrauma and three trauma centers for 48 hours or more. For survival, the false-negative rates of probability of survival calculated using the TRISS method were approximately half that of the ISS and age; no variable adequately explained survival among those with low falls. Combinations of ISS, RTS, and age explained the most variation in lengths of hospital stay among survivors, while ISS explained the most variation in lengths of intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Researchers should consider the ISS with RTS and age to control for severity when lengths of hospital or ICU stay are studied. The TRISS method should be used in studies of survival. In both cases, the RTS which requires data collection in the emergency department must be calculated.

摘要

损伤严重度评分(ISS)和年龄已被用于回顾性地控制创伤严重程度。其他控制变量,如修正创伤评分(RTS)和TRISS方法(该方法估计每个患者的生存概率),还要求在急诊科记录血压、格拉斯哥昏迷量表和呼吸频率的值。作者们质疑,在创伤研究中,何时应使用RTS、ISS、ISS与年龄,或使用TRISS方法计算的生存概率来控制损伤的严重程度。通过损伤原因比较预测变量与(1)存活至出院、(2)存活者的住院时间和(3)重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间之间的关系:穿透伤、机动车事故、低跌落伤或其他钝性伤。对连续2914例成年患者进行了为期12个月的数据收集,这些患者死亡或在五个非创伤中心和三个创伤中心住院48小时或更长时间。对于生存情况,使用TRISS方法计算的生存概率的假阴性率约为ISS和年龄的一半;没有变量能充分解释低跌落伤患者的生存情况。ISS、RTS和年龄的组合解释了存活者住院时间的最大差异,而ISS解释了重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间的最大差异。在研究住院或ICU住院时间时,研究人员应考虑将ISS与RTS和年龄结合起来以控制严重程度。在生存研究中应使用TRISS方法。在这两种情况下,都必须计算需要在急诊科收集数据的RTS。

相似文献

1
Controlling for the severity of injuries in emergency medicine research.在急诊医学研究中控制损伤的严重程度。
Am J Emerg Med. 1990 Nov;8(6):484-91. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(90)90147-r.
2
The use of Trauma Score-Injury Severity Score (TRISS) at Siriraj Hospital: how accurate is it?诗里拉吉医院创伤评分-损伤严重度评分(TRISS)的应用:其准确性如何?
J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Aug;92(8):1016-21.
3
The prognostic importance of trauma scoring systems in pediatric patients.创伤评分系统在儿科患者中的预后重要性。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2009 Jan;25(1):25-30. doi: 10.1007/s00383-008-2287-5. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
4
The end of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): ICISS, an International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision-based prediction tool, outperforms both ISS and TRISS as predictors of trauma patient survival, hospital charges, and hospital length of stay.损伤严重度评分(ISS)与创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)的终结:ICISS,一种基于国际疾病分类第九版的预测工具,在预测创伤患者的生存率、住院费用和住院时间方面优于ISS和TRISS。
J Trauma. 1998 Jan;44(1):41-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199801000-00003.
5
Incorporating recent advances to make the TRISS approach universally available.结合最新进展,使创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)方法普遍可用。
J Trauma. 2006 May;60(5):1002-8; discussion 1008-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000215827.54546.01.
6
Should the New Injury Severity Score replace the Injury Severity Score in the Trauma and Injury Severity Score?在创伤和损伤严重程度评分中,新损伤严重程度评分是否应取代损伤严重程度评分?
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2008 Oct;14(4):308-12.
7
Changes in the outcomes of severe trauma patients from 15-year experience in a Western European trauma ICU of Emilia Romagna region (1996-2010). A population cross-sectional survey study.基于艾米利亚-罗马涅地区一家西欧创伤重症监护病房15年经验(1996 - 2010年)的严重创伤患者结局变化。一项人群横断面调查研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Jan;399(1):109-26. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1143-9. Epub 2013 Nov 30.
8
The prognostic importance of trauma scoring systems for blunt thoracic trauma.创伤评分系统对钝性胸部创伤的预后重要性。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Apr;55(3):190-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-955883.
9
A comparison of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and the Trauma-Injury Severity Score (TRISS) for outcome assessment in intensive care unit trauma patients.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分与创伤严重程度评分(TRISS)在重症监护病房创伤患者预后评估中的比较。
Crit Care Med. 1996 Oct;24(10):1642-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199610000-00007.
10
Comparison of current injury scales for survival chance estimation: an evaluation comparing the predictive performance of the ISS, NISS, and AP scores in a Dutch local trauma registration.用于生存机会估计的当前损伤评分系统比较:一项在荷兰地方创伤登记中比较损伤严重度评分(ISS)、新损伤严重度评分(NISS)和简明损伤定级(AP)评分预测性能的评估
J Trauma. 2005 Mar;58(3):596-604. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000152551.39400.6f.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative and acute care outcomes in morbidly obese patients with acetabular fractures at a Level 1 trauma center.一级创伤中心中病态肥胖髋臼骨折患者的围手术期及急性护理结果
J Orthop. 2014 May 10;11(2):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2014.04.016. eCollection 2014 Jun.
2
Scoring systems in trauma.创伤评分系统
Ir J Med Sci. 2000 Jul-Sep;169(3):168-72. doi: 10.1007/BF03167688.
3
Accident and emergency medicine--I.急症医学——I
Postgrad Med J. 1992 Sep;68(803):714-34. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.68.803.714.