Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, UK.
Physiol Meas. 2012 Feb;33(2):103-16. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/2/103. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
The assessment of cerebral autoregulation (CA) relies mostly on methods that modulate arterial blood pressure (ABP). Despite advances, the gold standard of assessment remains elusive and clinical practicality is limited. We investigate a novel approach of assessing CA, consisting of the intermittent application of thigh cuffs using square wave sequences. Our aim was to increase ABP variability whilst minimizing volunteer discomfort, thus improving assessment acceptability. Two random square wave sequences and two maximum pressure settings (80 and 150 mmHg) were used, corresponding to four manoeuvres that were conducted in random order after a baseline recording. The intermittent application of thigh cuffs resulted in an amplitude dependent increase in ABP (p = 0.001) and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) variability (p = 0.026) compared to baseline. No statistically significant differences in mean heart rate or heart rate variability were observed (p = 0.108 and p = 0.350, respectively), suggesting that no significant sympathetic response was elicited. No significant differences in the CBFV step response were observed, suggesting no distortion of autoregulatory parameters resulted from the use of thigh cuffs. We conclude that pseudorandom binary sequences are an effective and safe alternative for increasing ABP variability. This new approach shows great promise as a tool for the robust assessment of CA.
脑自动调节(CA)的评估主要依赖于调节动脉血压(ABP)的方法。尽管取得了进展,但评估的金标准仍然难以捉摸,临床实用性有限。我们研究了一种评估 CA 的新方法,该方法包括使用方波序列间歇性地应用大腿袖带。我们的目的是在尽量减少志愿者不适的情况下增加 ABP 的可变性,从而提高评估的可接受性。使用了两个随机方波序列和两个最大压力设置(80 和 150mmHg),对应于在基线记录后随机顺序进行的四个操作。与基线相比,大腿袖带的间歇性应用导致 ABP(p=0.001)和大脑血流速度(CBFV)可变性(p=0.026)的幅度依赖性增加。平均心率或心率变异性没有观察到统计学上的显著差异(p=0.108 和 p=0.350,分别),这表明没有引起明显的交感神经反应。CBFV 阶跃响应没有观察到显著差异,这表明大腿袖带的使用没有导致自动调节参数的失真。我们得出结论,伪随机二进制序列是增加 ABP 可变性的有效且安全的替代方法。这种新方法作为 CA 稳健评估的工具具有很大的潜力。