Suppr超能文献

TNM7 用于结直肠癌分期:是否是时候使用这个新的分期系统了?

Colorectal cancer staging using TNM 7: is it time to use this new staging system?

机构信息

Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Pathol. 2012 Apr;65(4):372-4. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200503. Epub 2012 Jan 7.

Abstract

The authors audited pathological colorectal cancer staging according to tumour node metastasis (TNM) 7 and using TNM 5 as a gold standard. 144 consecutive colorectal cancer resection specimens were staged prospectively using both TNM 5 and TNM 7 criteria during routine reporting by specialist gastrointestinal pathologists within a single institution. The pN stage remained the same under both systems apart from the required subclassification of pN1 and pN2 under TNM 7. The TNM 7 pN1c category was used in only 3% of cases. All cases staged as pT4 underwent reversal of pT4 subclassification using TNM 7 compared with TNM 5. A previous study revealed stage migration from pN1 to pN2 in 32.6% of cases under TNM 7 compared with TNM 5. The difference in frequency of pN stage migration between this study and our audit suggests that the application of TNM 7 to the assessment of discontinuous/satellite tumour foci is subject to significant inter-observer variability.

摘要

作者根据肿瘤淋巴结转移(TNM)第 7 版对结直肠癌病理分期进行了审核,并将 TNM 第 5 版作为金标准。在单一机构中,由专门的胃肠病理学家在常规报告中前瞻性地使用 TNM 第 5 版和第 7 版标准对 144 例连续的结直肠癌切除标本进行分期。除了 TNM 第 7 版中需要对 pN1 和 pN2 进行细分外,两种系统的 pN 分期保持不变。仅在 3%的病例中使用了 TNM 第 7 版的 pN1c 类别。与 TNM 第 5 版相比,所有分期为 pT4 的病例在使用 TNM 第 7 版时均进行了 pT4 亚分期的逆转。先前的一项研究表明,与 TNM 第 5 版相比,在 TNM 第 7 版中,有 32.6%的病例从 pN1 转移到 pN2。本研究与我们的审核中 pN 分期迁移频率的差异表明,TNM 第 7 版应用于评估不连续/卫星肿瘤灶时,观察者之间存在显著的变异性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验