Ji Sang Yong, Gundewar Susheel, Palma Eugen C
Weiler Arrhythmia Service of the Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Apr;35(4):444-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03303.x. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
The incidence of subclavian venous occlusions (SCVOs) may be an increasing problem in the era of device upgrades, especially to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Venoplasty (VP) performed by the electrophysiologist as a way of managing SCVOs may be advantageous.
We reviewed the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implants of the past 5 years at Montefiore Medical Center and searched for SCVOs that required intervention and compared cases where VP was performed with cases where it was not.
Of 1,853 ICD implants, 41 SCVOs (2.2%) requiring intervention were identified. Its incidence increased seven-fold from 0.7% in 2005 to 5.2% in 2009. Twenty-seven of the 41 SCVOs were found during a device upgrade. Of these 41 SCVOs, 18 underwent VP and 23 did not. In the VP group, there was a trend towards a shorter total procedure time, 2:31 hours versus 3:28 hours (P=0.37), and the total fluoroscopy time was 30 minutes versus 27 minutes (P=0.55). VP was successful in all 18 patients. Among the non-VP group (n=23), five (21.5%) had a failed implantation because of the inability to gain venous access and 10 (42.7%) had to be implanted on the contralateral side.
The incidence of SCVOs requiring intervention is increasing in the era of device upgrades. VP performed by an electrophysiologist appears to be a safe and efficient approach to manage these SCVOs. VP seems to reduce the implant time and the need to implant on the other side as well as implant failure due to the inability to gain venous access.
在设备升级的时代,尤其是心脏再同步治疗时代,锁骨下静脉闭塞(SCVO)的发生率可能是一个日益严重的问题。由电生理学家进行的血管成形术(VP)作为处理SCVO的一种方法可能具有优势。
我们回顾了蒙特菲奥里医疗中心过去5年的植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)植入情况,寻找需要干预的SCVO,并比较了进行VP的病例和未进行VP的病例。
在1853例ICD植入中,确定了41例需要干预的SCVO(2.2%)。其发生率从2005年的0.7%增加到2009年的5.2%,增长了7倍。41例SCVO中有27例是在设备升级期间发现的。在这41例SCVO中,18例接受了VP,23例未接受。在VP组中,总手术时间有缩短的趋势,分别为2小时31分钟和3小时28分钟(P = 0.37),总透视时间分别为30分钟和27分钟(P = 0.55)。VP在所有18例患者中均成功。在非VP组(n = 23)中,5例(21.5%)因无法获得静脉通路而植入失败,10例(42.7%)不得不植入对侧。
在设备升级时代,需要干预的SCVO发生率正在增加。由电生理学家进行的VP似乎是处理这些SCVO的一种安全有效的方法。VP似乎可以减少植入时间、减少对侧植入的需求以及因无法获得静脉通路导致的植入失败。