Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Dec;28(8):1951-8. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0008-6. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
To evaluate impact of echocardiography on patient management based on published transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC). A prospective analysis of 170 consecutive outpatients who underwent TTE over a period of 2 months. Echo studies were classified into appropriate (A), inappropriate (I), or uncertain (U) based on the 2007/2011 AUC. A fourth group of studies which were not addressed by the 2007 AUC and therefore have unclassifiable category (UC) were also included in the analysis. The impact of AUC categorized echo results on patient management were evaluated by review of patient records in the ensuing 2 months. Based on 2007 AUC, 77% (131/170) were A, 9% were I, and 14% were UC category. Echo studies classified as A were more likely to be associated with new and major findings, (P = 0.034) and (P = 0.028) respectively when compared to all other studies. Furthermore, patient care intervention as defined in the study protocol was significantly associated with A studies as opposed to I and UC studies (P = 0.004). A studies were also more likely to have an impact on patient management when compared to other studies (P = 0.022). When studies were re-evaluated based on the 2011 AUC, all prior UC studies were now included in the U group in the new AUC of 2011, and there was no change in A or I study classification. This study demonstrates that the 2007/2011 AUC are helpful in evaluating practice patterns in a majority of outpatients undergoing TTE. Implementing AUC have a direct clinical impact as A studies are significantly more likely to reveal new and major findings, and more likely to result in a patient care intervention based on the echo findings.
为了评估超声心动图对患者管理的影响,我们根据已发表的经胸超声心动图(TTE)适宜性使用标准(AUC)进行了前瞻性分析。对连续 2 个月内进行 TTE 的 170 例门诊患者进行了前瞻性分析。根据 2007/2011 AUC,将超声心动图研究分为适宜(A)、不适宜(I)或不确定(U)。还包括了第四组未被 2007 AUC 涵盖的研究,因此归入不可分类(UC)组。通过审查接下来 2 个月内的患者记录,评估 AUC 分类的超声心动图结果对患者管理的影响。根据 2007 AUC,77%(131/170)为 A,9%为 I,14%为 UC。与所有其他研究相比,A 类超声心动图研究更有可能与新的主要发现相关(P = 0.034)和(P = 0.028)。此外,与 I 类和 UC 类研究相比,研究方案中定义的患者护理干预与 A 类研究显著相关(P = 0.004)。与其他研究相比,A 类研究也更有可能对患者管理产生影响(P = 0.022)。当根据 2011 AUC 重新评估研究时,所有先前的 UC 研究现在都被归入新的 2011 AUC 的 U 组,A 和 I 类研究的分类没有变化。这项研究表明,2007/2011 AUC 有助于评估大多数接受 TTE 的门诊患者的实践模式。实施 AUC 具有直接的临床影响,因为 A 类研究更有可能揭示新的和主要的发现,并且更有可能根据超声心动图结果进行患者护理干预。