Suppr超能文献

ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 超声心动图适宜性使用标准。美国心脏病学会基金会适宜性使用标准专家组,美国超声心动学会,美国心脏协会,美国核医学学会,美国心力衰竭学会,美国心律学会,心血管血管造影和介入学会,重症监护医学学会,心血管计算机断层成像学会,心血管磁共振学会,美国胸科医师学会报告。

ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance American College of Chest Physicians.

出版信息

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Mar;24(3):229-67. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.12.008.

Abstract

The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), in partnership with the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted a review of common clinical scenarios where echocardiography is frequently considered. This document combines and updates the original transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography appropriateness criteria published in 2007 (1) and the original stress echocardiography appropriateness criteria published in 2008 (2). This revision reflects new clinical data, reflects changes in test utilization patterns,and clarifies echocardiography use where omissions or lack of clarity existed in the original criteria.The indications (clinical scenarios)were derived from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines and results of studies examining the implementation of the original appropriate use criteria (AUC).The 202 indications in this document were developed by a diverse writing group and scored by a separate independent technical panel on a scale of 1 to 9,to designate appropriate use(median 7 to 9), uncertain use(median 4 to 6), and inappropriate use (median 1 to 3). Ninety-seven indications were rated as appropriate, 34 were rated as uncertain, and 71 were rated as inappropriate. In general,the use of echocardiography for initial diagnosis when there is a change in clinical status or when the results of the echocardiogram are anticipated to change patient management were rated appropriate. Routine testing when there was no change in clinical status or when results of testing were unlikely to modify management were more likely to be inappropriate than appropriate/uncertain.The AUC for echocardiography have the potential to impact physician decision making,healthcare delivery, and reimbursement policy. Furthermore,recognition of uncertain clinical scenarios facilitates identification of areas that would benefit from future research.

摘要

美国心脏病学会基金会(ACCF)与美国超声心动图学会(ASE)合作,并与主要的专业和亚专业学会一起,对经常考虑使用超声心动图的常见临床情况进行了审查。本文件结合并更新了 2007 年发表的原始经胸和经食管超声心动图适宜性标准(1)以及 2008 年发表的原始应激超声心动图适宜性标准(2)。本修订反映了新的临床数据,反映了检测使用模式的变化,并澄清了在原始标准中存在遗漏或不明确的情况下的超声心动图使用。这些适应证(临床情况)源自常见的应用或预期用途,以及当前的临床实践指南和检查原始适宜使用标准(AUC)实施情况的研究结果。本文档中的 202 个适应证由一个多元化的写作小组制定,并由一个独立的技术小组进行独立评分,评分范围为 1 至 9,以指定适宜使用(中位数为 7 至 9)、不确定使用(中位数为 4 至 6)和不适当使用(中位数为 1 至 3)。97 个适应证被评为适宜,34 个被评为不确定,71 个被评为不适宜。一般来说,当临床状况发生变化或预计超声心动图结果将改变患者管理时,将超声心动图用于初始诊断被评为适宜。当临床状况没有变化或测试结果不太可能改变管理时,常规测试更有可能被评为不适当而非适当/不确定。超声心动图的 AUC 有可能影响医生的决策、医疗服务的提供和报销政策。此外,识别不确定的临床情况有助于确定需要进一步研究的领域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验