Suppr超能文献

达比加群与急性冠脉事件高风险相关:非劣效性随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Dabigatran association with higher risk of acute coronary events: meta-analysis of noninferiority randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Uchino Ken, Hernandez Adrian V

机构信息

Cerebrovascular Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Mail Code S80, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2012 Mar 12;172(5):397-402. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1666. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The original RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulant Therapy) trial suggested a small increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) with the use of dabigatran etexilate vs warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. We systematically evaluated the risk of MI or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with the use of dabigatran.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science for randomized controlled trials of dabigatran that reported on MI or ACS as secondary outcomes. The fixed-effects Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) test was used to evaluate the effect of dabigatran on MI or ACS. We expressed the associations as odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Seven trials were selected (N = 30,514), including 2 studies of stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation, 1 in acute venous thromboembolism, 1 in ACS, and 3 of short-term prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis. Control arms included warfarin, enoxaparin, or placebo administration. Dabigatran was significantly associated with a higher risk of MI or ACS than that seen with agents used in the control group (dabigatran, 237 of 20,000 [1.19%] vs control, 83 of 10,514 [0.79%]; OR(M-H), 1.33; 95% CI, 1.03-1.71; P = .03). The risk of MI or ACS was similar when using revised RE-LY trial results (OR(M-H), 1.27; 95% CI, 1.00-1.61; P = .05) or after exclusion of short-term trials (OR(M-H), 1.33; 95% CI, 1.03-1.72; P = .03). Risks were not heterogeneous for all analyses (I(2) = 0%; P ≥ .30) and were consistent using different methods and measures of association.

CONCLUSIONS

Dabigatran is associated with an increased risk of MI or ACS in a broad spectrum of patients when tested against different controls. Clinicians should consider the potential of these serious harmful cardiovascular effects with use of dabigatran.

摘要

背景

最初的RE-LY(长期抗凝治疗随机评估)试验表明,在房颤患者中,与使用华法林相比,使用达比加群酯发生心肌梗死(MI)的风险略有增加。我们系统评估了使用达比加群发生MI或急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的风险。

方法

我们检索了PubMed、Scopus和科学网,查找将MI或ACS作为次要结局报告的达比加群随机对照试验。采用固定效应Mantel-Haenszel(M-H)检验评估达比加群对MI或ACS的影响。我们将关联表示为比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

共入选7项试验(N = 30514),包括2项房颤卒中预防研究、1项急性静脉血栓栓塞研究、1项ACS研究和3项短期深静脉血栓形成预防研究。对照臂包括使用华法林、依诺肝素或安慰剂。与对照组使用的药物相比,达比加群与MI或ACS风险显著升高相关(达比加群,20000例中有237例[1.19%],对照组,10514例中有83例[0.79%];OR(M-H),1.33;95%CI,1.03 - 1.71;P = 0.03)。使用修订的RE-LY试验结果时(OR(M-H),1.27;95%CI,1.00 - 1.61;P = 0.05)或排除短期试验后(OR(M-H),1.33;95%CI,1.03 - 1.72;P = 0.03),MI或ACS风险相似。所有分析的风险均无异质性(I² = 0%;P≥0.30),且使用不同方法和关联测量时结果一致。

结论

与不同对照相比,达比加群在广泛患者中与MI或ACS风险增加相关。临床医生在使用达比加群时应考虑这些严重有害心血管效应的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验