• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与华法林相比,达比加群酯在老年和年轻房颤患者中使用 2 剂的出血风险:随机长期抗凝治疗评估(RE-LY)试验分析。

Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial.

机构信息

Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Circulation. 2011 May 31;123(21):2363-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.004747. Epub 2011 May 16.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.004747
PMID:21576658
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dabigatran 150 and 110 mg twice a day and warfarin are effective for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this study was to compare their risks of bleeding in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy (RE-LY) trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The RE-LY trial randomized 18 113 patients to receive dabigatran 110 or 150 mg twice a day or warfarin dose adjusted to an international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0 for a median follow-up of 2.0 years. Compared with warfarin, dabigatran 110 mg twice a day was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (2.87% versus 3.57%; P=0.002), whereas dabigatran 150 mg twice a day was associated with a similar risk of major bleeding (3.31% versus 3.57%; P=0.32). There was a significant treatment-by-age interaction, such that dabigatran 110 mg twice a day compared with warfarin was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding in patients aged <75 years (1.89% versus 3.04%; P<0.001) and a similar risk in those aged ≥75 years (4.43% versus 4.37%; P=0.89; P for interaction <0.001), whereas dabigatran 150 mg twice a day compared with warfarin was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding in those aged <75 years (2.12% versus 3.04%; P<0.001) and a trend toward higher risk of major bleeding in those aged ≥75 years (5.10% versus 4.37%; P=0.07; P for interaction <0.001). The interaction with age was evident for extracranial bleeding, but not for intracranial bleeding, with the risk of the latter being consistently reduced with dabigatran compared with warfarin irrespective of age.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke, both doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin have lower risks of both intracranial and extracranial bleeding in patients aged <75 years. In those aged ≥75 years, intracranial bleeding risk is lower but extracranial bleeding risk is similar or higher with both doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00262600.

摘要

背景

达比加群 150 毫克和 110 毫克,每日两次,以及华法林均可有效预防房颤患者发生卒中。本研究旨在比较这两种药物在随机评价长期抗凝治疗(RE-LY)试验中的出血风险。

方法和结果

RE-LY 试验将 18113 例患者随机分为达比加群 110 毫克,每日两次,或达比加群 150 毫克,每日两次,或华法林组(调整国际标准化比值至 2.0~3.0),中位随访时间为 2.0 年。与华法林相比,达比加群 110 毫克,每日两次治疗组大出血风险较低(2.87% vs. 3.57%;P=0.002),而达比加群 150 毫克,每日两次治疗组大出血风险相似(3.31% vs. 3.57%;P=0.32)。存在治疗与年龄的交互作用,提示达比加群 110 毫克,每日两次治疗组与华法林相比,在年龄<75 岁的患者中出血风险较低(1.89% vs. 3.04%;P<0.001),在年龄≥75 岁的患者中出血风险相似(4.43% vs. 4.37%;P=0.89;P 值<0.001),而达比加群 150 毫克,每日两次治疗组与华法林相比,在年龄<75 岁的患者中出血风险较低(2.12% vs. 3.04%;P<0.001),在年龄≥75 岁的患者中出血风险有升高趋势(5.10% vs. 4.37%;P=0.07;P 值<0.001)。这种与年龄的交互作用在颅外出血中明显,但在颅内出血中不明显,与华法林相比,达比加群始终降低颅内出血风险。

结论

在存在卒中风险的房颤患者中,与华法林相比,达比加群的两种剂量均能降低年龄<75 岁患者的颅内和颅外出血风险。对于年龄≥75 岁的患者,颅内出血风险较低,但达比加群的两种剂量均使颅外出血风险相似或升高。

临床试验注册

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。注册号:NCT00262600。

相似文献

1
Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial.与华法林相比,达比加群酯在老年和年轻房颤患者中使用 2 剂的出血风险:随机长期抗凝治疗评估(RE-LY)试验分析。
Circulation. 2011 May 31;123(21):2363-72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.004747. Epub 2011 May 16.
2
Periprocedural bleeding and thromboembolic events with dabigatran compared with warfarin: results from the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) randomized trial.与华法林相比,达比加群的围手术期出血和血栓栓塞事件:来自随机评估长期抗凝治疗(RE-LY)随机试验的结果。
Circulation. 2012 Jul 17;126(3):343-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.090464. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
3
Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin in relation to baseline renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation: a RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial analysis.达比加群酯与华法林在伴有基线肾功能异常的房颤患者中的疗效和安全性比较:RE-LY(随机评估长期抗凝治疗)试验分析。
Circulation. 2014 Mar 4;129(9):961-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003628. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
4
Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.达比加群酯与华法林预防房颤卒中的成本效果比较。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jan 4;154(1):1-11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-1-201101040-00289. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
5
Myocardial ischemic events in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with dabigatran or warfarin in the RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial.RE-LY 试验中接受达比加群或华法林治疗的心房颤动患者的心肌缺血事件。
Circulation. 2012 Feb 7;125(5):669-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.055970. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
6
Dabigatran and atrial fibrillation: the alternative to warfarin for selected patients.达比加群与心房颤动:特定患者使用的华法林替代药物
Prescrire Int. 2012 Feb;21(124):33-6.
7
Management and outcomes of major bleeding during treatment with dabigatran or warfarin.达比加群或华法林治疗期间大出血的管理和结局。
Circulation. 2013 Nov 19;128(21):2325-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002332. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
8
Balancing the benefits and risks of 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in atrial fibrillation.比较达比加群酯与华法林在心房颤动中两剂的获益与风险。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Sep 3;62(10):900-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.042. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
9
Intracranial hemorrhage in atrial fibrillation patients during anticoagulation with warfarin or dabigatran: the RE-LY trial.华法林或达比加群抗凝治疗的房颤患者颅内出血:RE-LY 试验。
Stroke. 2012 Jun;43(6):1511-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.650614. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
10
The Long-Term Multicenter Observational Study of Dabigatran Treatment in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) Study.达比加群酯治疗心房颤动的长期多中心观察性研究(RELY-ABLE 研究)。
Circulation. 2013 Jul 16;128(3):237-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001139. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.口服抗凝剂在老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中的疗效与安全性:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):4534-4545. doi: 10.62347/JOJX2439. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂在老年房颤患者中的比较有效性和安全性:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2025 Jun 9;17(6):e85615. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85615. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Long-term clinical outcomes of oral anticoagulation in the older patients with atrial fibrillation aged ≥80 years: a report from the GLORIA-AF registry phase III.
≥80岁老年房颤患者口服抗凝治疗的长期临床结局:来自GLORIA-AF注册研究III期的报告
Age Ageing. 2025 May 31;54(6). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf139.
4
Pattern of anticoagulation prescription for elderly atrial fibrillation patients with or without severe dementia: A retrospective analysis of patient data.有或无严重痴呆的老年房颤患者的抗凝处方模式:患者数据的回顾性分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 9;104(19):e42343. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042343.
5
Stroke Prevention With Oral Anticoagulants in High-Risk Atrial Fibrillation in an Aging Population.老年高危心房颤动患者口服抗凝剂预防卒中
JACC Adv. 2025 Jun;4(6 Pt 1):101757. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101757. Epub 2025 May 9.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors in Patients With Nephrotic Syndrome: Results From a National Retrospective Study.口服直接Xa因子抑制剂在肾病综合征患者中的安全性和有效性:一项全国性回顾性研究的结果
Kidney Int Rep. 2025 Feb 3;10(4):1188-1195. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2025.01.042. eCollection 2025 Apr.
7
Oral Anticoagulation Choice and Dosage in Very Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.高龄房颤患者的口服抗凝治疗选择与剂量
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Feb 26;12(3):86. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12030086.
8
Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use in Older Adults with Atrial Fibrillation: Challenges and Solutions.老年心房颤动患者直接口服抗凝剂的使用:挑战与解决方案
Eur Cardiol. 2025 Feb 20;20:e03. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2024.17. eCollection 2025.
9
Outcomes and Disease Management in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation ≥80 Years: Data From a Consecutive 11-Year Real-World Registry.80岁及以上心房颤动患者的结局与疾病管理:来自连续11年真实世界注册研究的数据
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Feb 18;14(4):e036832. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036832. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
10
Efficacy and Safety of New Oral Anticoagulants versus Warfarin in the Resolution of Atrial Fibrillation with Left Atrial/Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新型口服抗凝药与华法林在心房颤动合并左心房/左心耳血栓溶解中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jan 20;26(1):26055. doi: 10.31083/RCM26055. eCollection 2025 Jan.