Bachmann Talis
Department of Psychology and Institute of Law, University of Tartu Tartu, Estonia.
Front Psychol. 2011 Dec 29;2:387. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00387. eCollection 2011.
Equivalence of attention and consciousness is disputed and necessity of attentional effects for conscious experience has become questioned. However, the conceptual landscape and interpretations of empirical evidence as related to this issue have remained controversial. Here I present some conceptual distinctions and research strategies potentially useful for moving forward when tackling this issue. Specifically, it is argued that we should carefully differentiate between pre-conscious processes and the processes resulting in phenomenal experience, move the emphasis from studying the effects of attention on the modality-specific and feature-specific perception to studying attentional effects on panmodal universal attributes of whatever conscious experience may be the case, and acknowledge that there is a specialized mechanism for leading to conscious experience of the pre-consciously represented contents autonomous from the mechanisms of perception, attention, memory, and cognitive control.
注意力与意识的等同性存在争议,有意识体验中注意力效应的必要性也受到了质疑。然而,与此问题相关的概念框架和实证证据的解释仍存在争议。在此,我提出一些概念上的区分和研究策略,在解决这个问题时可能有助于取得进展。具体而言,有人认为我们应该仔细区分前意识过程和产生现象体验的过程,将重点从研究注意力对特定模态和特定特征感知的影响,转移到研究注意力对任何有意识体验情况下的泛模态普遍属性的影响,并承认存在一种专门机制,可使前意识表征的内容独立于感知、注意力、记忆和认知控制机制而产生有意识体验。