Marchetti Giorgio
Mind, Consciousness and Language Research Center, Alano di Piave, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 25;15:1340943. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1340943. eCollection 2024.
The primary determinant of the self (S) is the conscious experience (CE) we have of it. Therefore, it does not come as a surprise that empirical research on S mainly resorts to the CE (or lack of CE) that subjects have of their S. What comes as a surprise is that empirical research on S does not tackle the problem of how CE contributes to building S. Empirical research investigates how S either biases the cognitive processing of stimuli or is altered through a wide range of means (meditation, hypnosis, etc.). In either case, even for different reasons, considerations of how CE contributes to building S are left unspecified in empirical research. This article analyzes these reasons and proposes a theoretical model of how CE contributes to building S. According to the proposed model, the phenomenal aspect of consciousness is produced by the modulation-engendered by attentional activity-of the energy level of the neural substrate (that is, the organ of attention) that underpins attentional activity. The phenomenal aspect of consciousness supplies the agent with a sense of S and informs the agent on how its S is affected by the agent's own operations. The phenomenal aspect of consciousness performs its functions through its five main dimensions: qualitative, quantitative, hedonic, temporal, and spatial. Each dimension of the phenomenal aspect of consciousness can be explained by a specific aspect of the modulation of the energy level of the organ of attention. Among other advantages, the model explains the various forms of S as outcomes resulting from the operations of a single mechanism and provides a unifying framework for empirical research on the neural underpinnings of S.
自我(S)的主要决定因素是我们对其的意识体验(CE)。因此,对S的实证研究主要诉诸于受试者对其S的意识体验(或缺乏意识体验)也就不足为奇了。令人惊讶的是,对S的实证研究并未解决意识体验如何促成自我构建的问题。实证研究考察的是S如何影响刺激的认知加工,或者S如何通过多种方式(冥想、催眠等)发生改变。在这两种情况下,无论出于何种原因,实证研究都未明确考虑意识体验如何促成自我构建。本文分析了这些原因,并提出了一个关于意识体验如何促成自我构建的理论模型。根据所提出的模型,意识的现象层面是由注意力活动对支撑注意力活动的神经基质(即注意力器官)能量水平的调节所产生的。意识的现象层面为主体提供了自我感,并告知主体其自我如何受到主体自身行为的影响。意识的现象层面通过其五个主要维度发挥作用:质性、量性、享乐性、时间性和空间性。意识现象层面的每个维度都可以通过注意力器官能量水平调节的一个特定方面来解释。该模型的诸多优点之一是,它将各种形式的自我解释为单一机制运作的结果,并为关于自我神经基础的实证研究提供了一个统一的框架。