Suppr超能文献

参与“遵循指南”项目的医疗保险心力衰竭住院患者的治疗过程及结果。

Get With The Guidelines program participation, process of care, and outcome for Medicare patients hospitalized with heart failure.

作者信息

Heidenreich Paul A, Hernandez Adrian F, Yancy Clyde W, Liang Li, Peterson Eric D, Fonarow Gregg C

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jan;5(1):37-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.959122. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospitals enrolled in the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines Program for heart failure (GWTG-HF) have improved their process of care. However, it is unclear if process of care and outcomes are better in the GWTG-HF hospitals compared with hospitals not enrolled.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared hospitals enrolled in GWTG-HF from 2006 to 2007 with other hospitals using data on 4 process of heart failure care measures, 5 noncardiac process measures, risk-adjusted 30-day mortality, and 30-day all-cause readmission after a heart failure hospitalization, as reported by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Among the 4460 hospitals reporting data to CMS, 215 (5%) were enrolled in GWTG-HF. Of the 4 CMS heart failure performance measures, GWTG-HF hospitals had significantly higher documentation of the left ventricular ejection fraction (93.4% versus 88.8%), use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor antagonist (88.3% versus 86.6%), and discharge instructions (74.9% versus 70.5%) (P<0.005 for all). Smoking cessation counseling rates were similar (94.1% versus 94.0%; P=0.51). There was no significant difference in compliance with noncardiac process of care. After heart failure discharge, all-cause readmission at 30 days was 24.5% and mortality at 30 days after admission was 11.1%. After adjustment for hospital characteristics, 30-day mortality rates were no different (P=0.45). However, 30-day readmission was lower for GWTG hospitals (-0.33%; 95% CI, -0.53% to -0.12%; P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was evidence that hospitals enrolled in the GTWG-HF program demonstrated better processes of care than other hospitals, there were few clinically important differences in outcomes. Further identification of opportunities to improve outcomes, and inclusion of these metrics in GTWG-HF, may further support the value of GTWG-HF in improving care for patients with HF.

摘要

背景

参与美国心脏协会心力衰竭“遵循指南”项目(GWTG-HF)的医院改善了其护理流程。然而,与未参与该项目的医院相比,GWTG-HF医院的护理流程和治疗结果是否更好尚不清楚。

方法与结果

我们使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)报告的数据,将2006年至2007年参与GWTG-HF的医院与其他医院进行了比较,这些数据涉及4项心力衰竭护理流程指标、5项非心脏流程指标、风险调整后的30天死亡率以及心力衰竭住院后的30天全因再入院率。在向CMS报告数据的4460家医院中,215家(5%)参与了GWTG-HF。在CMS的4项心力衰竭绩效指标中,GWTG-HF医院在左心室射血分数的记录方面显著更高(93.4%对88.8%),血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体拮抗剂的使用比例更高(88.3%对86.6%),出院指导的比例更高(74.9%对70.5%)(所有P<0.005)。戒烟咨询率相似(94.1%对94.0%;P=0.51)。在非心脏护理流程的依从性方面没有显著差异。心力衰竭出院后,30天全因再入院率为24.5%,入院后30天死亡率为11.1%。在对医院特征进行调整后,30天死亡率没有差异(P=0.45)。然而,GWTG医院的30天再入院率较低(-0.33%;95%CI,-0.53%至-0.12%;P=0.002)。

结论

尽管有证据表明参与GTWG-HF项目的医院的护理流程比其他医院更好,但在治疗结果方面几乎没有临床上的重要差异。进一步确定改善治疗结果的机会,并将这些指标纳入GTWG-HF,可能会进一步支持GTWG-HF在改善心力衰竭患者护理方面的价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验