University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):507-14. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.056. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
Emerging data suggest botulinum toxin is an effective treatment for detrusor overactivity (DO), but large studies confirming efficacy and safety are lacking.
Study the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNTA) for the treatment of DO.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial in eight UK urogynaecology centres was conducted between 2006 and 2009. A total of 240 women with refractory DO were randomised to active or placebo treatment and followed up for 6 mo.
Treatment consisted of 200 IU onaBoNTA or placebo injected into the bladder wall (20 sites; 10 IU per site in 1ml saline).
Primary outcome was voiding frequency per 24h at 6 mo. Secondary outcomes included urgency and incontinence episodes and quality-of-life data. Intention-to-treat analysis was used with imputation of missing data.
A total of 122 women received onaBoNTA and 118 received the placebo. Median (interquartile range) voiding frequency was lower after onaBoNTA compared with placebo (8.3 [6.83-10.0] vs 9.67 [8.37-11.67]; difference: 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-2.33; p=0.0001). Similar differences were seen in urgency episodes (3.83 [1.17-6.67] vs 6.33 [4.0-8.67]; difference: 2.50; 95% CI, 1.33-3.33; p<0.0001) and leakage episodes (1.67 [0-5.33] vs 6.0 [1.33-8.33]; difference: 4.33; 95% CI, 3.33-5.67; p<0.0001). Continence was more common after botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA; 31% vs 12%; odds ratio [OR]: 3.12; 95% CI, 1.49-6.52; p=0.002). Urinary tract infection (UTI; 31% vs 11%; OR: 3.68; 95% CI, 1.72-8.25; p=0.0003) and voiding difficulty requiring self-catheterisation (16% vs 4%; OR: 4.87; 95% CI, 1.52-20.33; p=0.003) were more common after onaBoNTA.
This randomised controlled trial of BoNTA for refractory DO, the largest to date, confirms efficacy and safety of the compound. UTI (31%) and self-catheterisation (16%) are common. A third of women achieved continence.
The study received ethical committee approval from the Scottish Multicentre Research Ethics Committee (reference: 04/MRE10/67). The trial has a EudraCT number (2004-002981-39), a clinical trial authorisation from the UK Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency, and it was registered on Current Controlled Trials (ISRCTN26091555) on May 26, 2005.
新出现的数据表明肉毒毒素是治疗逼尿肌过度活动(DO)的有效方法,但缺乏证实其疗效和安全性的大型研究。
研究经尿道注射肉毒毒素 A(onaBoNTA)治疗逼尿肌过度活动的疗效和安全性。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项在英国 8 家泌尿科妇科中心进行的双盲安慰剂对照随机试验,于 2006 年至 2009 年进行。共有 240 例难治性逼尿肌过度活动的女性患者被随机分为活性治疗组或安慰剂治疗组,并随访 6 个月。
治疗组接受 200IU onaBoNTA 或安慰剂膀胱壁注射(20 个部位;1ml 生理盐水内每个部位注射 10IU)。
主要结局是治疗后 6 个月时 24 小时内的排尿频率。次要结局包括尿急和失禁发作以及生活质量数据。采用意向治疗分析,对缺失数据进行了插补。
共有 122 名女性接受了 onaBoNTA 治疗,118 名女性接受了安慰剂治疗。与安慰剂相比,onaBoNTA 治疗后排尿频率中位数(四分位距)较低(8.3[6.83-10.0]与 9.67[8.37-11.67];差值:1.34;95%置信区间[CI]:1.00-2.33;p=0.0001)。尿急发作的差异也相似(3.83[1.17-6.67]与 6.33[4.0-8.67];差值:2.50;95%CI:1.33-3.33;p<0.0001)和漏尿发作(1.67[0-5.33]与 6.0[1.33-8.33];差值:4.33;95%CI:3.33-5.67;p<0.0001)。与肉毒毒素 A(BoNTA)治疗相比,膀胱功能更常见(31%比 12%;优势比[OR]:3.12;95%CI:1.49-6.52;p=0.002)。与安慰剂相比,尿路感染(UTI;31%比 11%;OR:3.68;95%CI:1.72-8.25;p=0.0003)和需要自行导尿的排尿困难(16%比 4%;OR:4.87;95%CI:1.52-20.33;p=0.003)更为常见。
这是一项针对难治性逼尿肌过度活动的 BoNTA 随机对照试验,是迄今为止最大的一项研究,证实了该化合物的疗效和安全性。UTI(31%)和自我导尿(16%)很常见。三分之一的女性实现了膀胱功能正常。
该研究得到了苏格兰多中心伦理委员会的伦理委员会批准(参考号:04/MRE10/67)。该试验有一个 EudraCT 编号(2004-002981-39)、英国药品和保健产品监管局的临床试验授权,并且于 2005 年 5 月 26 日在当前对照试验(ISRCTN26091555)上注册。