文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

《伤员现场分类指南:国家现场分类专家小组 2011 年的建议》。

Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011.

机构信息

Division of Injury Response, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3717, USA.

出版信息

MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012 Jan 13;61(RR-1):1-20.


DOI:
PMID:22237112
Abstract

In the United States, injury is the leading cause of death for persons aged 1-44 years. In 2008, approximately 30 million injuries were serious enough to require the injured person to visit a hospital emergency department (ED); 5.4 million (18%) of these injured patients were transported by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). On arrival at the scene of an injury, the EMS provider must determine the severity of injury, initiate management of the patient's injuries, and decide the most appropriate destination hospital for the individual patient. These destination decisions are made through a process known as "field triage," which involves an assessment not only of the physiology and anatomy of injury but also of the mechanism of the injury and special patient and system considerations. Since 1986, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) has provided guidance for the field triage process through its "Field Triage Decision Scheme." This guidance was updated with each version of the decision scheme (published in 1986, 1990, 1993, and 1999). In 2005, CDC, with financial support from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, collaborated with ACS-COT to convene the initial meetings of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage (the Panel) to revise the decision scheme; the revised version was published in 2006 by ACS-COT (American College of Surgeons. Resources for the optimal care of the injured patient: 2006. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2006). In 2009, CDC published a detailed description of the scientific rationale for revising the field triage criteria (CDC. Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage. MMWR 2009;58[No. RR-1]). In 2011, CDC reconvened the Panel to review the 2006 Guidelines in the context of recently published literature, assess the experiences of states and local communities working to implement the Guidelines, and recommend any needed changes or modifications to the Guidelines. This report describes the dissemination and impact of the 2006 Guidelines; outlines the methodology used by the Panel for its 2011 review; explains the revisions and modifications to the physiologic, anatomic, mechanism-of-injury, and special considerations criteria; updates the schematic of the 2006 Guidelines; and provides the rationale used by the Panel for these changes. This report is intended to help prehospital-care providers in their daily duties recognize individual injured patients who are most likely to benefit from specialized trauma center resources and is not intended as a mass casualty or disaster triage tool. The Panel anticipates a review of these Guidelines approximately every 5 years.

摘要

在美国,伤害是 1-44 岁人群死亡的主要原因。2008 年,大约有 3000 万人的伤害严重到需要受伤人员去医院急诊部(ED)就诊;其中 540 万人(18%)的受伤患者由紧急医疗服务(EMS)运送。在伤害现场,EMS 提供者必须确定伤害的严重程度,开始对患者的伤害进行管理,并决定对个体患者最适合的医院。这些目的地决策是通过一个被称为“现场分类”的过程做出的,该过程不仅涉及对损伤的生理学和解剖学的评估,还涉及损伤的机制以及特殊的患者和系统考虑因素。自 1986 年以来,美国外科医师学会创伤委员会(ACS-COT)一直在通过其“现场分类决策方案”为现场分类过程提供指导。该指南通过每次发布的决策方案进行更新(1986 年、1990 年、1993 年和 1999 年)。2005 年,CDC 在国家公路交通安全管理局的财政支持下,与 ACS-COT 合作,召集了国家现场分类专家组的第一次会议(专家组),以修订决策方案;修订版于 2006 年由 ACS-COT 发布(美国外科医师学会。最佳伤员护理资源:2006.芝加哥,IL:美国外科医师学会;2006 年)。2009 年,CDC 发布了一份详细描述修订现场分类标准的科学依据的说明(CDC.受伤患者现场分类指南:国家现场分类专家组的建议。MMWR 2009;58[No. RR-1])。2011 年,CDC 重新召集专家组,根据最近发表的文献审查 2006 年的指南,评估各州和地方社区实施指南的经验,并建议对指南进行任何必要的更改或修改。本报告描述了 2006 年指南的传播和影响;概述了专家组在 2011 年审查中使用的方法;解释了生理、解剖、损伤机制和特殊考虑标准的修订和修改;更新了 2006 年指南的示意图;并提供了专家组对这些变化的基本原理。本报告旨在帮助院前护理人员在日常工作中识别最有可能受益于专门创伤中心资源的个体受伤患者,而不是作为大规模伤亡或灾难分类工具。专家组预计每 5 年左右对这些指南进行一次审查。

相似文献

[1]
Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011.

MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012-1-13

[2]
Guidelines for field triage of injured patients. Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage.

MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009-1-23

[3]
Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients: In conjunction with the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report published by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

West J Emerg Med. 2013-2

[4]
Ability of the Physiologic Criteria of the Field Triage Guidelines to Identify Children Who Need the Resources of a Trauma Center.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017

[5]
Effect of the 2011 Revisions to the Field Triage Guidelines on Under- and Over-Triage Rates for Pediatric Trauma Patients.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017

[6]
An Evidence-based Guideline for the air medical transportation of prehospital trauma patients.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013-11-26

[7]
Does mechanism of injury predict trauma center need?

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011

[8]
A review of traumatic brain injury trauma center visits meeting physiologic criteria from The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Field Triage Guidelines.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012-5-1

[9]
Trends in the accuracy of older person trauma triage from 2004 to 2008.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010-9-28

[10]
Evaluation of the Implementation of the Trauma Triage and Destination Plan on the Field Triage of Injured Patients in North Carolina.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017

引用本文的文献

[1]
Right patient to the right place: the impact of a 6-year regional trauma centre-led prehospital education programme on EMS triage and patient outcomes.

BMC Emerg Med. 2025-8-20

[2]
Developing and integrating a destination decision support algorithm into an innovative electronic communication platform to improve injury care service coordination in Rwanda: the Rwanda912 study protocol.

BMJ Open. 2025-6-27

[3]
Undertriage of Severe Geriatric Trauma Patients: Who Are We Missing?

Yonsei Med J. 2025-7

[4]
The Age-Modified Shock Index: Predicting Massive Transfusion and Mortality in Traumatic Injury Patients.

Emerg Med Int. 2025-6-4

[5]
A Machine Learning Trauma Triage Model for Critical Care Transport.

JAMA Netw Open. 2025-6-2

[6]
Derivation and Experimental Performance of Standard and Novel Uncertainty Calibration Techniques.

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025-5-22

[7]
Outcomes of blunt trauma patients in police versus ground ambulance transport across US trauma centers.

Acute Med Surg. 2025-5-8

[8]
Predicting the Need for Tertiary Trauma Care Using a Multivariable Model: A 4-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2025-3-10

[9]
The Norwegian national trauma registry: development process and essential data insights.

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025-5-1

[10]
Reverse shock index multiplied by simplified motor score as an indicator of clinical outcomes in patients with abdominal trauma in the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索