Suppr超能文献

西妥昔单抗治疗转移性或局部晚期软组织肉瘤或骨肉瘤患者的 II 期临床试验。

Phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with metastatic or locally advanced soft tissue or bone sarcoma.

机构信息

Moses Cone Reg Cancer Ctr., Greensboro, NC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb;36(1):77-82. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31823a4970.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase is overexpressed in many sarcoma subtypes. In vitro studies suggest a role of the EGFR pathway in growth and differentiation in some sarcomas. We conducted a phase II trial of cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody to EGFR, in patients with advanced sarcomas.

METHODS

Cetuximab was administered intravenously as a loading dose on 400 mg/m on day 1, cycle 1 and subsequently 250 mg/m on days 1, 8, 15, and 21 of a 28 day cycle. Using a Simon 2-stage design, 21 EGFR patients were to be accrued in the first stage, with an additional 11 patients if >3 patients met the primary endpoint of 4-month progression-free survival (PFS). An exploratory subgroup of EGFR patients was also included.

RESULTS

Twenty-one and 15 evaluable patients enrolled in the EGFR and EGFR subgroup, respectively. One of 21 EGFR patients (4.8%) achieved 4-month PFS. Median PFS and overall survival were 1.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.6-1.8] and 7.7 months (95% CI, 4.2-10.7), respectively. Three of 15 EGFR patients (20%) achieved 4-month PFS. Median PFS and overall survival were 1.8 months (95% CI, 0.8-2.5) and 15.7 months (95% CI, 7.7-25.3), respectively. No responses were seen in either group. There was no correlation between clinical outcomes and expression of MAP-K, PTEN, and phospho-EGFR.

CONCLUSIONS

Cetuximab is not an active as a single agent in advanced sarcoma. Further study of anti-EGFR therapy in sarcoma should only be considered after identification of molecular abnormalities predictive of benefit.

摘要

背景

表皮生长因子受体 (EGFR) 酪氨酸激酶在许多肉瘤亚型中过度表达。体外研究表明 EGFR 通路在一些肉瘤的生长和分化中起作用。我们对晚期肉瘤患者进行了西妥昔单抗(一种针对 EGFR 的单克隆抗体)的 II 期临床试验。

方法

西妥昔单抗在第 1 周期的第 1 天静脉给予负荷剂量 400mg/m2,随后在第 1、8、15 和 21 天的 28 天周期内给予 250mg/m2。采用 Simon 两阶段设计,第 1 阶段入组 21 例 EGFR 患者,如果>3 例患者达到主要终点 4 个月无进展生存期 (PFS),则额外入组 11 例患者。还包括了一个 EGFR 患者的探索性亚组。

结果

21 例和 15 例可评估的 EGFR 和 EGFR 亚组患者分别入组。21 例 EGFR 患者中有 1 例(4.8%)达到 4 个月 PFS。中位 PFS 和总生存期分别为 1.7 个月(95%CI,1.6-1.8)和 7.7 个月(95%CI,4.2-10.7)。15 例 EGFR 患者中有 3 例(20%)达到 4 个月 PFS。中位 PFS 和总生存期分别为 1.8 个月(95%CI,0.8-2.5)和 15.7 个月(95%CI,7.7-25.3)。两组均未观察到缓解。临床结果与 MAP-K、PTEN 和磷酸化 EGFR 的表达之间无相关性。

结论

西妥昔单抗作为单一药物在晚期肉瘤中没有活性。只有在确定了预测获益的分子异常后,才应考虑进一步研究抗 EGFR 治疗在肉瘤中的应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验