Suppr超能文献

姿势反应有无急性颈外固定的对比研究:健康受试者与单侧急性前庭损失患者的比较研究。

Postural responses without versus with acute external cervical spine fixation: a comparative study in healthy subjects and patients with acute unilateral vestibular loss.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Jena, Lessingstrasse 2, 07740, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jan;270(1):61-7. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1911-5. Epub 2012 Jan 12.

Abstract

Using a diagnostic prospective cohort single center study design, the influence of a cervical collar on standing balance during dynamic postural perturbations in healthy adults and patients with acute unilateral vestibular dysfunction was measured in 31 healthy subjects and 27 patients with acute unilateral vestibular loss. The main outcome measures were completed standard protocols on the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) and Motor Control Test (MCT) of the NeuroCom Equitest(®) computerized posturography platform measured without and with acute cervical fixation, respectively. Paired t test showed no significant difference during the six conditions of neither the SOT scores nor analyzing the SOT strategies or during the MCT between the non-fixed and fixed neck in healthy subjects and in the patients (all p > 0.05). Older healthy subjects showed decreased SOT scores but equal MCT results. The age effect was more dominant in the patients when wearing the collar. Gender had no influence whether in healthy individuals nor in patients. In almost all conditions of the SOT but only in some MCT subtests patients had significantly lower scores than healthy subjects without collar and with collar (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, the SOT but only some subtest of the MCT could clearly distinguish between healthy adults and patient with acute unilateral vestibular loss. Equilibrium scores did not change significantly when the cervical spine was fixed with a collar. Acute fixation of the neck with a collar seems not to affect standing balance, even not when vestibular, visual and/or somatosensory input are also reduced.

摘要

采用诊断前瞻性队列单中心研究设计,在 31 名健康受试者和 27 名单侧急性前庭功能障碍患者中测量了颈托对健康成年人和单侧急性前庭功能障碍患者在动态姿势扰动期间站立平衡的影响。主要观察指标为分别在无急性颈椎固定和急性颈椎固定下完成 NeuroCom Equitest(®)计算机平衡测试平台上的感觉组织测试(SOT)和运动控制测试(MCT)的标准方案。配对 t 检验显示,健康受试者和患者在 SOT 评分的六个条件下,在 SOT 策略的分析中,或在 MCT 中,无论是无颈托还是颈托固定,均无显著差异(均 p>0.05)。健康的老年受试者 SOT 评分降低,但 MCT 结果相等。当佩戴颈托时,年龄的影响在患者中更为明显。无论在健康个体中还是在患者中,性别均无影响。在 SOT 的几乎所有条件下,但仅在 MCT 的某些子测试中,患者的得分明显低于无颈托和戴颈托的健康受试者(均 p<0.05)。总之,SOT 但仅 MCT 的一些子测试可以清楚地区分健康成年人和单侧急性前庭功能丧失患者。当颈椎用颈托固定时,平衡评分无明显变化。即使在减少前庭、视觉和/或躯体感觉输入的情况下,用颈托固定颈部也不会明显影响站立平衡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验