Suppr超能文献

缺乏保险和同等待遇会影响女性产后在长效可逆避孕措施和绝育之间的选择。

Lack of insurance and parity influence choice between long-acting reversible contraception and sterilization in women postpregnancy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2012 Jul;86(1):42-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.11.005. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disparities in postpregnancy contraception utilization exist, with low-income women disproportionately undergoing sterilization. We assessed the impact of increased intrauterine device (IUD) availability on rates of female sterilization.

STUDY DESIGN

Hospital billing records were used to identify women with an IUD placement or sterilization within 1 year of a pregnancy at a university hospital between Oct 2005 and Jun 2007. Demographic data were compared between women receiving either an IUD or sterilization.

RESULTS

There were 365 sterilizations and 223 IUD placements during the study period. IUD placements doubled over the study period from 6% to 12% of all deliveries, while sterilizations remained stable at 11% (p<.001). Demographic variables were examined for women with either public or private insurance who had financial access to both sterilization (n=253) and IUD (n=223). Women receiving sterilization were slightly older (mean age 31 years versus 30 years, p=.03), of higher parity (median three versus two, p<.01), more likely to have had cesarean delivery (69% versus 31%, p<.001) and more likely to have public insurance (77% versus 23%, p<.001) than women who received IUD. Approximately 45% of women delivering in Oregon in 2007 were publicly insured (2010 Maternal and Child Health Update: States Make Progress Towards Improving Systems of Care. National Governor's Association, Table 6. Available at http://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/pdf/MCHUPDATE2010.PDF, accessed Nov 2011). After adjusting for age, parity and type of delivery, women choosing sterilization were more likely to have public insurance than women choosing IUD (odds ratio 8.4, 95% confidence interval 4.7-14.9, p<.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Women choosing sterilization are more likely to have public insurance than women choosing IUD and may represent a continued trend toward nonreversible contraception among women of lower socioeconomic status despite available long-acting reversible methods.

摘要

背景

妊娠后避孕方法的利用存在差异,低收入妇女接受绝育的比例不成比例。我们评估了宫内节育器(IUD)可及性增加对女性绝育率的影响。

研究设计

利用医院计费记录,在 2005 年 10 月至 2007 年 6 月期间,对某大学医院内妊娠后 1 年内接受 IUD 放置或绝育的妇女进行识别。比较接受 IUD 或绝育的妇女之间的人口统计学数据。

结果

在研究期间,共有 365 例绝育术和 223 例 IUD 放置术。IUD 放置术在研究期间翻了一番,从所有分娩的 6%增加到 12%,而绝育术保持稳定在 11%(p<.001)。对有公共或私人保险且有经济条件接受绝育术(n=253)和 IUD(n=223)的妇女进行了人口统计学变量检查。接受绝育术的妇女年龄稍大(平均年龄 31 岁,而 30 岁,p=.03),产次更高(中位数为 3 次,而 2 次,p<.01),更有可能进行剖宫产(69%,而 31%,p<.001),更有可能有公共保险(77%,而 23%,p<.001),而接受 IUD 的妇女。2007 年在俄勒冈州分娩的妇女中,约有 45%有公共保险(2010 年母婴健康更新:各州在改善护理系统方面取得进展。国家州长协会,表 6. 可从以下网址获取:http://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/pdf/MCHUPDATE2010.PDF,于 2011 年 11 月访问)。调整年龄、产次和分娩类型后,选择绝育术的妇女更有可能有公共保险,而不是选择 IUD(优势比 8.4,95%置信区间 4.7-14.9,p<.0001)。

结论

选择绝育术的妇女更有可能有公共保险,而不是选择 IUD,尽管有长效可逆避孕方法,但这可能代表着社会经济地位较低的妇女中不可逆转避孕方法的持续趋势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验