Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 15;167(1):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.12.035. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
Current American Heart Association guidelines recommend against the performance of elective or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without on-site surgical backup (i.e. a class III and IIb recommendation respectively). Despite this, numerous centers have already implemented PCI programs with no on-site surgery backup (NSOS).
To evaluate the necessity for on-site surgical backup (SOS) when performing PCI we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. English-language articles published from 1966 through December 2010 were retrieved using keyword searches of Medline and Scopus, supplemented by letters to authors and reviews of all bibliographies. Article inclusion and data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. We identified 18 articles published between 1992 and 2009 which contained reported events on 1,150,200 patients.
The combined odds ratio calculated using a random effects model for death with NSOS was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.80-1.09). In studies with data reported for primary PCI and elective PCI the OR for death was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.84-1.00) and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.67-1.63). A lack of effect of SOS was maintained when analysis was performed by study type or by either primary or elective PCI. No differences in rates of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, post procedural myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, or cerebrovascular accidents were observed between SOS and NSOS centers.
Both primary and elective PCI can safely be performed at NSOS centers without an increase in mortality or PCI related complications. AHA/ACC guidelines should reflect the lack of benefit conferred by on-site surgical backup. In establishing PCI programs, adequate operator/center volumes, patient selection, and geographic/population considerations should take precedence rather than the availability of on-site surgical backup during PCI.
目前美国心脏协会指南建议避免在无现场手术支持的情况下进行选择性或原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)(即分别为 III 类和 IIb 类推荐)。尽管如此,许多中心已经在没有现场手术支持的情况下实施了 PCI 计划(NSOS)。
为了评估在进行 PCI 时现场手术支持(SOS)的必要性,我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。使用 Medline 和 Scopus 的关键字搜索以及对作者的信函和所有参考文献的综述,检索了 1966 年至 2010 年 12 月期间发表的英文文章。由两名独立的审查员进行文章纳入和数据提取。我们确定了 18 篇发表于 1992 年至 2009 年的文章,其中包含 1150200 例患者的报告事件。
使用随机效应模型计算的 NSOS 时死亡率的合并优势比为 0.93(95% CI,0.80-1.09)。在报告了原发性 PCI 和选择性 PCI 数据的研究中,死亡的 OR 为 0.91(95% CI,0.84-1.00)和 1.04(95% CI,0.67-1.63)。当按研究类型或原发性或选择性 PCI 进行分析时,SOS 的效果并未改变。在 SOS 和 NSOS 中心之间,没有观察到紧急冠状动脉旁路移植术、术后心肌梗死、靶血管血运重建或脑血管意外的发生率差异。
在 NSOS 中心,原发性和选择性 PCI 均可安全进行,不会增加死亡率或 PCI 相关并发症。AHA/ACC 指南应反映现场手术支持带来的益处。在建立 PCI 计划时,应优先考虑操作人员/中心的容量、患者选择以及地理位置/人口因素,而不是 PCI 期间是否有现场手术支持。